User talk:SP612
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I have reverted you good faith edits at Authority based on the Wikipedia policy of WP:UNDUE weight. You edits are related exclusively to the sociological aspect of authority and there is an article that best fits your edits at authority (sociology). Also, it may be useful for you to check out the Wikipedia Manual of Style at WP:MOS, as the inline manner you are using to provide citations to comply with the verifiability policy at WP:V is not consistent with the standard format. Regards, My name is Mercy11 (talk) 14:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC), and I approve this message.
The edits were based on PSYCHOLOGICAL aspects of authority, and done by students studying the subject. The article is flagged as part of the APS (Association for Psychological Science) Wiki initiative, and there is no reason why psychological approaches should not feed into the article. Besides, I saw you left the section on Max Weber in the article, which is curious as Max Weber is a sociologist. Based on your reasoning the section should also be moved to the other article. SP612 (talk) 12:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Black sheep, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Identification and Outgroup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse Invitation
[edit]
|
Hello! SP612,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
|
Cheesecake
[edit]This was not helpful. Materialscientist (talk) 09:32, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egocentrism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piaget. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
What are you doing?
[edit]What did you do to the Egocentrism article? Do you not understand how to correctly edit an article? __209.179.23.132 (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Your edits have been mentioned at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology. Samsara 02:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
IP edits?
[edit]Hello,
Was just looking at the history of obedience (human behavior) and wonder if 129.12.96.76 is you? Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)