User talk:SNIyer12/Archive13

Reds-Cards

I definitely believe it to be significant. The history goes back to the beginning of baseball. It just started heating up in the 60s. It's definitely more significant than the Astros-Cards, which looks like was finally deleted. Arnabdas (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cards-Reds rivalry

Just so you know, it is not a good idea to redirect an article in the middle of an AFD discussion. Once the result of the discussion finishes, the article may be deleted entirely (at this point, if it's not notable enough for an article, it's probably not even notable enough for a mention on the main rivalries page, based on the reasons provided at the AFD). umrguy 42 15:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, when the info is NOT on the MLB rivalries page, AND the page itself (and as such, the rivalry) has been judged as non-notable, there's not much point in re-creating the page as a redirect. I have accordingly nominated it for speedy deletion. umrguy 42 20:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reds–Cardinals rivalry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reds–Cardinals rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. umrguy 42 20:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reds-Cardinals rivalry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reds-Cardinals rivalry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're not the one who recreated the article, but WP:TW automatically tagged you with this anyway because you are initial contributor. Don't mind this, carry on. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Baltimore/Washington

I brought this up on the MLB Rivalries talk page. I'd like to know your opinion.Ultimahero (talk) 03:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly don't have to respond, but then you can't really make a change to the topic if you won't give an opinion.Ultimahero (talk) 01:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bruins–Canadiens rivalry

Hi. I see you're moving the series table into the infobox. I'd prefer the table remain separately, as it gives a much better historical overview, in my opinion. Jmj713 (talk) 18:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mets–Phillies rivalry

Template:Mets–Phillies rivalry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — KV5 • Talk • 23:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not redirect the templates involved in the discussion while the discussion is in progress. Removing the TfD tags is not allowed. You must let the discussion complete its course, and redirecting as you were doing is not an appropriate action in this case because it's going to double templates on most of those articles. So just let them alone until the discussion is over, please. — KV5 • Talk • 11:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there's no need to go around removing the templates from articles just yet, either. umrguy 42 18:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT redirect these templates now after the deletion discussion has concluded. The result of the discussion was "delete", not "redirect", and if you persist, you could risk a block, because that's contrary to policy. Don't restore the rivalry templates as redirects. — KV5 • Talk • 11:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]