User talk:SIN JONES
Welcome!
Hello, SIN JONES, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
A summary of some guidelines you may find useful
[edit]- A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
- Always cite a source for any new information, using <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
- "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
- We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
- Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Like I said before
[edit]- A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The particular cult of Cthulhu you're promoting (by the way, promotion is not allowed here) does not meet that standard. Just because it exists does not make it worthy of inclusion. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)