User talk:SILICON-POWER

Welcome!

Hello, SILICON-POWER, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Londongrad, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 16:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Londongrad

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Londongrad, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 16:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Great Antonio (film), to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You should read our guidance on anticipated events and Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films before you consider continuing. —SMALL JIM 17:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cleo (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cleo (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleo (film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Great Antonio (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Great Antonio (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Antonio (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for future films

A number of pages you created have recently been nominated for deletion as they have failed the notability guidelines for future films. Would suggest that you have a read at WP:NFF. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Creating multiple pages for movies which do not satisfy WP:NFF Gaijin42 (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Repeated creation of movie pages which fail WP:NFF and addition of unsourced information into other film related pages. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Expendables 3 (film)

The article The Expendables 3 (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Likely WP:HOAX, utterly unreferenced, and in any case, film does not appear to have begun principal photography, so falls outside of WP:NFILM guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Expendables 3 (film)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Expendables 3 (film), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing, including repeated creation of inappropriate pages and recreating them when they were deleted via AfD. Please use this week to read over guidelines such as general notability guidelines and more specifically the guide for movies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of We Mortals Are for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article We Mortals Are (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Mortals Are (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Krevans (talk) 07:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bad Ass (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bad Ass (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Ass (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Truthsort (talk) 23:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Normal Heart (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Normal Heart (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Normal Heart (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions 15:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Behind the Candelabra (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Behind the Candelabra (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behind the Candelabra (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 05:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Behind the Candelabra (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Behind the Candelabra (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WP:NFF films Gaijin42 (talk) 14:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Given the number of inappropriate pages you have created in spite of warnings, I am indefinitely blocking this account. Read the instructions above if you wish to request an unblock. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]