User talk:SIJOPTG2

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — 🦊 08:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SIJOPTG2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only wanted to say hi to some people and then I got a message warning me so I removed it and then Nigos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) came along and didn't even know how to use the g10 CSD template SIJOPTG2 (talk) 08:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to describe how you want to participate in building this encyclopedia, as until the block you had not edited one article. As your first edit from this account was to give a barnstar, I suspect this isn't your first account, either. If you had a previous account, you should return to that account. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nigos Let's voluntarily not talk and let an admin review my unblock. SIJOPTG2 (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the {{help me}} template appropriately.
The {{help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{help me-inappropriate}} on this page with {{help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

@Fox, 331dot, and Nigos: I am sorry for the distruption I caused this morning. Please ask a CheckUser or Arb to contact me if you want to know who is behInd this and why? SIJOPTG2 (talk) 12:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC) @Oshwah, El C, Praxidicae, Cyberpower678, and TheSandDoctor: SIJOPTG2 (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me}} does not review unblock requests. You've been told how to appeal your block (describe how you want to participate in building this encyclopedia) and pinging multiple administrators without answering is more likely cause additional disruption. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha3031: Please can you ask a CU or Arb to get in touch. I think you should read the above. SIJOPTG2 (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make another actual unblock request. CheckUsers don't typically get involved unless there is a need to, which there doesn't seem to be at this moment. Your unblock request is for explaining your situation. If for some reason you must give private information in your request, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

331dot: As you guessed, I am a sock of someone. I want to come clean but only to a CU/Arb. I will not be unblocked. SIJOPTG2 (talk) 13:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to communicate with ArbCom, you should send an email per Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee#Contacting the Committee. This doesn't really call for a checkuser, as they don't need to use their powers if you are admitting to being a sock. 331dot (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, I had already run a checkuser on you for the blatant socking.

Likely bordering on

Confirmed. Stop playing games. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]