User talk:SG73

Hi SG73

I know you've been here for sometime, but noticed hadn't been welcomed yet. Please let me do the honours!

Thank you for your very valuable contributions to Wikipedia, and a very warm welcome to the community! We're always grateful to have new people joining in and contributing with improvements to the encyclopedia. Here are a few suggestions to work your way around:

Do have a look at The five pillars of Wikipedia
I'm sure the tutorial will be of great help, as will reading How to edit a page
The Manual of Style has tips on making Wikipedia articles look consistent
You might also like to read How to write a great article and maybe the picture tutorial if you're interested in adding images to your articles
The help page contains loads of, well, helpful information

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Do remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your name and the datestamp. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or feel free to contact me.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! -Aabha (talk) 11:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Rodgers

Please can you verify the awards using reliable sources ASAP before I re-remove in line with BLP policy? Giant Snowman 09:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you removing the manager of month awards for all other managers over the last 20 years too?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_League_Championship_Manager_of_the_Month https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_League_Manager_of_the_Month

He was also the manager of Swansea during the promotion season. This is an undeniable fact. Therefore he has to been there to win the play off final. SG73 (talk) 11:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Something being an "undeniable fact" is irrelevant on Wikipedia; all information MUST be verfified using reliable sources. Giant Snowman 11:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked the sources at the bottom of the manager of the month wikipedia pages. There are sources there. His OWN page also lists him as manager of Swansea during the period of winning promotion. He therefore had to have won the play off. Have you removed all manager of the month awards for other managers too. If you remove these, without removing other manager of the month awards through history, then there's no hope for you. I agree things to be verified, but unless you start doing global changes to other managers, you shouldn't change this one. The point should be raised on a higher level article which concerns all managers.

http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/clubs/managers/profile.overview.html/brendan-rodgers

SG73 (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and I'd also advise you to read WP:BLP sooner rather than later. Giant Snowman 11:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My point is this, was you also removing 20 odd years worth of manager of month information from other managers? If not then only one manager shouldn't be changed. Also, if it is PLAINLY obvious that he was Swansea manager during 2010 and 2012. Then he HAD to have won the play off final without citations required.

I agree that sources should be used, but so should common sense. There are enough trolls on here edited things with crap. I try and help, I may not be an expert but I'm no troll. SG73 (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at discussions with other people in regards to mass deletion of "unsourced" yet bloody obvious material. It's idiotic. SG73 (talk) 13:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Template:Liverpool F.C. squad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, ironically I was going to change it back when I couldn't find the sources myself. You got there first. SG73 (talk) 15:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattythewhite, can you tell me how is people like GiantSnowman allowed to moderate Wiki. He's an official troll. He is a destructive editor. True fans of football clubs take care of their clubs players. He's a known problem, and goes around deleting peoples work. He gives a secret 1 months notice of deleting historical stats and honours based on a stupid rule. I will add citations where required and have done. But it's impossible, when a jobsworth is going around deleting. There are sources upon sources within the article referencing the things he deletes. I'm guessing editors give up trying to help because of this idiot. SG73 (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kenny Dalglish. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 11:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been adding sourced material, people have jobs and will add sources in time. I've been adding sources to as many Liverpool players I find time for. Others believe it or not are deleting the sources because of over kill. You are destructive and shouldn't be allowed anywhere near wikipedia. There are real trolls out there defacing articles for fun, but you tend to randomly add a secret 1 months notice and then delete real posters work. How many other people out there have left because of people like you. You are a problem, a known problem. There are links to LFCHistory all over his page. All referencing the things you delete. SG73 (talk) 12:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BLP - the material has been challenged and removed, you cannot re-add the material without also using reliable sources at the same time! Giant Snowman 19:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it, and I, as well as many other people don't agree with you. As you're a troll, should be blocked from Wikipedia. SG73 (talk) 08:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mario Balotelli. Giant Snowman 13:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Mario Balotelli. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. In addition, you shouldn't be reinserting unsourced material into a BLP, and you've been warned for this before. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are not useful to Wikipedia. You're a hindererence and a troll. I edited in the past and added references. Then some other jobsworth said there was too many references and removed them. Then as there wasn't enough references for another Giant and he deleted the information. Can't win. SG73 (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I find that seriously hard to believe; such claims need to be backed up with actual evidence. Content does not get removed for having "too many references". Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It happened. I was fed up of Giant being destructive and made the effort finding sources. Every cup won linked to a cup final page etc. Then someone removed the references citing there was too many. Then Giant did his usual. For me it's very destructive and inconsistent editing, some are removed some are not. How can "manager of the month" be removed when linked to the "manager of the month" wiki page, where all the citations are. All managers should have that removed then, also, the "manager of the month page" should be removed.

This 1 months secret notice isn't enough. It's as if he's counting down the days rubbing his hands together waiting to remove information. People should be encouraged to edit and source information. Build, not destroy. I've read the rules, I think they have and can be been interpreted differently. This is the reason I've practically given up editing.

SG73 (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SG73. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SG73. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jake Daniels, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 17:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes you're right. I do have a source/citation, I'll do it properly next time. SG73 (talk) 22:19, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]