User talk:SDD17

SDD17, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SDD17! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Strictly Come Dancing has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Strictly Come Dancing was changed by SDD17 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891174 on 2014-12-24T14:06:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Neighbours characters

Hi, I noticed that you removed Bossy from the list. You may be interested in the discussion on the talk page about this very issue. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Neighbours characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AusSoaps (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Neighbours characters, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. AusSoaps (talk) 23:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Animals can be characters too. Even though Bossy is an animal, she is still a character. She has her own character profile at List of Neighbours characters (2012)#Bossy. Another Neighbours dog Bouncer was also a character who has his own character article. Other TV shows that have animals as characters include Skippy the Bush Kangaroo and The Simpsons' Santa's Little Helper. Now please stop removing Bossy from the table at List of Neighbours characters. That is a list of characters article for all the current characters in the show. AusSoaps (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Neighbours characters. Why do you keep removing Bossy from the characters list? 5 albert square (talk) 00:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bossy is a character regardless of her species, therefore she belongs on the characters table. Other soap dogs such as Bouncer, Wellard and Wellard 2 also have their own articles. Any questions please do not hesitate to ask.--5 albert square (talk) 00:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of Holby City characters

Please join in the discussion about your edits today at the above talk page. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

" Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove or blank out sections of page content, templates or other materials from the 'Vinícius Júnior' page, you may be blocked from editing. Please consider this a formal warning. Thank you. You've been off the Wikipedia editing scene for a while, but now you're back, making some pretty big changes on the 'Vinícius Júnior' page. Do you have any personal grudge against the player? What's up with that?" Sartaj267 17:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What makes this disruptive? The page should be factual and I am simply removing a subjective comment which EndzoneEnthusiast is unable to prove. SDD17 (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While your enthusiasm for 'facts' is noted, you've overlooked that the deleted content was verified and deemed neutral. Wikipedia isn't a solo act. It's about collaboration and discussion, not unilateral decisions. Multiple reliable sourced were added after the context. Look up. So, before making the next big 'clean up', drop a line on the talk page. Thanks. Sartaj267 17:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]