User talk:SCRebel1740
A belated welcome!
[edit]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, SCRebel1740. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Editor's index to Wikipedia
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 00:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Winnsboro, South Carolina, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Battle of the Pineberry Battery
[edit]Hello, SCRebel1740,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Battle of the Pineberry Battery should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Pineberry Battery .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Eddie Blick (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (10th South Carolina Infantry) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating 10th South Carolina Infantry, SCRebel1740!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
10th South Carolina Infantry
[edit]Hey,
I see you´ve started an article about the 10th SC Infantry as you´ve done with other units - thanks for that as there can´t be enough people to add missing content. I´d begun to write an article on the 10th myself some year/s ago but never finished and therefore never uploaded it to not post it with missing stuff. But now that you´re started it I´ve uploaded it anyway; apparently overwriting much of your material which I´m sorry for; please readd whereever you see it to be fit or beneficial. My service history ends in late 1863 with the Battle of Missionary Ridge and so is missing 1864 and 1865. If you have material for that period please consider to follow up and post it.
And if you ever long for civil war related discussion and other interested people outside of wikipedia I can only invite you to join civilwartalk.com.
Much Regards ...GELongstreet (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SCRebel1740. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SCRebel1740. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)