User talk:SAADGT

December 2012

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically List of WWE Champions, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Papacha (talk) 13:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of WWE Champions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Papacha (talk) 20:10, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, as you did at John Cena, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Richard BB 13:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 14:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Richard BB 14:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ShakiraWalk.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ShakiraWalk.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

atrl.net

I've noticed you struggling with edit filters recently. Please keep in mind that the forums at atrl.net cannot be used to source data on Wikipedia. If you want to include a figure, you need to find a better source than an anonymous forum.—Kww(talk) 21:21, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Eminem, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 19:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of best-selling singles, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Eminem. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 17:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I warned you above about using atrl.net as a source. Consider this to be your final warning: if I see you including figures from atrl.net (even if you try to sneak them in by not labeling your sources), I will block you from editing. If you want to change a sales figure, you need to find a reliable source for the new figure.—Kww(talk) 18:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Eminem, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 16:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for using the SAADWWE account to insert the very changes that you were warned about above. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 20:49, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been extended because of continued block evasion using User:SAAD-ROCK.—Kww(talk) 20:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

Please refrain from moving Eminem upwards on the List of best-selling music artists using inflated sales figures coming from sources that are not acceptable at the List of best-selling music artists. Eminem cannot be listed with 200 million units as his available certified sales (86.6 million) can only support sales claims of up to 150 million. All artists who have begun charting in 1999 need their claimed figures supported by 58% certified sales. The details about how List of best-selling music artists is operated, can be found both in the lead of the list and also at the top of the talk page (see the second yellow box from the top on the talk page).--Harout72 (talk) 14:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing Eminem's claimed sales to 200 million as he needs to have that figure supported by 58% certified sales, that is 116 million certified units. Also, in your recent edit, two of your sources aren't reliable and the third one cannot be found. As I explained to you in my previous warning, Eminem can only be listed with a maximum of 150 million units at the List of best-selling music artists as his available certified sales are only 86.6 million.--Harout72 (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing Eminem's claimed sales to 220 million. Eminem CANNOT be listed with such inflated figure with his 86.6 million certified units. Be advised that further similar changes will constitute disruptive editing. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.--Harout72 (talk) 22:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Survival (Eminem song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 14:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Marshall Mathers LP 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Berzerk (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me! 22:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Zad68 03:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked generally for making controversial edits (mostly Eminem-related edits at List of best-selling music artists) and failing to use any Talk page anywhere, ever, despite numerous requests to discuss with your fellow editors. The length of the the block, one month, is based on your previous block history and the number of unanswered pleas to you to stop just making controversial changes without discussing them. Now is the time for you to start using Talk pages, please. If you don't, there would be good justification for making your next block indef. Zad68 03:16, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Monster (song), you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 17:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Eminem discography. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Et 3 rnal 19:26, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for failing to adhere to WP:V, and failing to discuss editing with other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Zad68 13:32, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have returned to exhibiting the same bad editing behaviors immediately after your block expired, so you have been blocked from editing indefinitely. Zad68 13:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]