User talk:S8m2s

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tom Suozzi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Frmatt (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Suozzi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Frmatt (talk) 06:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thomas Suozzi. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Frmatt (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Thomas Suozzi. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Frmatt (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thomas Suozzi. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — ξ ^xplicit 06:28, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the information posted by the previous editor is inaccurate and slanderous.

ANI

Please see [1] as it is a discussion about your recent edits. Frmatt (talk) 06:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lemonyellowsun for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — ξ ^xplicit 06:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 17:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.