User talk:S8823140F
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/S8823140F for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 18:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
September 2006
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Also, all content, as per Wikipedia policy MUST be verifiable and must not infringe any copyrights. Please do your Internet research before making any edits with hoax information. Thank you for your cooperation.
October 2006
[edit]Please don't post messages on pages that are completely irrelevant to the topic of the page. It can be seen as spam and Wikipedia regards adding spam to articles or talk pages as a form of vandalism. Thank you. Hbdragon88 08:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hbdragon88 08:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Clearly you know about timecrisis and House of the dead - wouldn't it be better to communicate with your fellow editors rather than have this username blocked because you keep do the stuff that you did last time? --Charlesknight 08:40, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Charlesknight 09:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:The House of the Dead 4. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Charlesknight 09:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Why are you unwilling to communicate with your fellow editors? All that is going to happen is that once you have hit 4 warnings you will be banned like yesterday. It's not even like it's hard work for us. --Charlesknight 09:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Charlesknight 08:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The information you have posted under The House of the Dead 5 section has been removed...again. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball/forum. Your speculation has no grounds whatsoever, as no information has been given on the matter at all. Thus, please stop adding it back to the article, or you will be considered for blocking. Thank you. --Benten 16:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Kingdom Hearts II
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Interrobamf 12:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Do not remove template tags from talk pages, this is perceived as vandalism. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 19:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
The information you have posted under List of Time Crisis characters has been removed...again. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball/forum. Your speculation has no grounds whatsoever, as no information has been given on the matter at all. Thus, please stop adding it back to the article, or you will be nominated for indefinite blocking. Thank you. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 01:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
House of the Dead III Characters
[edit]Your statement that James Taylor and Dan Taylor is unsourced. This might be late but you have started an annoying paragraph that has almost absolutely relavence or fact whatsoever.