User talk:S4city

Your recent edits

Please stop with the nonsense edits. Consider this your only warning. Thank you. Nymf _talk/contr. 21:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aristotle, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Aristotle was changed by S4city (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9862 on 2010-12-15T11:39:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Onion constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Adambro (talk) 11:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Carroll, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Andy Carroll was changed by S4city (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89823 on 2010-12-15T12:42:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Harry Potter. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Isa (disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:48, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 14:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

S4city (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17539 was submitted on Feb 15, 2017 12:03:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, anyway is fine aslong as my account is unblocked. Please just do anyS4city (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Email received from user on 2017-02-16: Please can you unblock my Wikipedia account? I was still in school when I made this account and got myself blocked, I'm now 20 years old and very mature. The only thing I remember from being blocked is changing Andy Carroll to Alex because he looked like him, apart from that I dont remember. I would really like my account back and I 100% will not do anything like that again because I am now grown up, please accept my apologies as I want my account back.

Please note that email is not the proper venue for this request. It is done through this Talk Page or UTRS (which already has a case open). Please check this conversation about it. An uninvolved Admin is handling it. As per your future contributions to Wikipedia, they are always welcome, as long as you abide by the rules and contribute to the project. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Younganz Fusion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Younganz Fusion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.skiddle.com/whats-on/Manchester/Rebellion/Bison-Briggz---New-Wave-Oasis-Party/12981748/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 17:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anything to do with Younganz Fusion I own the rights to. S4city (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Younganz Fusion. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Younganz Fusion, you may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. reddogsix (talk) 19:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I own all the rights to Younganz Fusion so stop trying to get the page deleted!! Everything posted is accurate information so stop trying to take it down S4city (talk) 23:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Younganz Fusion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Younganz Fusion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih ^Talk 08:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]