User talk:S1462065

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2556 Thailand (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! S1462065, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2556 Thailand (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

This draft does not establish why this particular court decision in Thailand is notable in the Wikipedia sense of having been referred to by multiple independent reliable sources. This draft appears to have one actual source, the court decision itself, and the references have reference errors. Please explain why this court decision is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for assistance with AfC

Hello, I noticed your request for assistance on your AfC article. User:Robert McClenon left a comment on your article, suggesting you improve your article by the ways mentioned there. As he stated, you should state why the case is notable, and you should find some additional citations. If you have any more questions, feel free to request for more AfC assistance. Thanks. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2556 Thailand (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

This draft still does not establish why this particular court decision is notable. This draft is being tendentiously resubmitted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand

User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Court Decision no.8089-2556 Thailand

Draft:Court Decision no.8089-2556 Thailand, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Court Decision no.8089-2556 Thailand and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Court Decision no.8089-2556 Thailand during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]