User talk:S1312/Archive3

Welcome Visitors listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Welcome Visitors. Since you had some involvement with the Welcome Visitors redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 00:17, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:CBSSCENE.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CBSSCENE.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 01:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thorny Lea Golf Club for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Thorny Lea Golf Club, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thorny Lea Golf Club until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 01:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is the worst listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia is the worst. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia is the worst redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:ICT Logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ICT Logo.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 05:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Northerneastonintersection.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Northerneastonintersection.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

South Shore article edits

I have tweaked the lead paragraph of South Shore (Massachusetts) to address the issues that are raised by the varying definitions of the region. As the article text explains, there is no well-defined officially sourced definition of South Shore that is agreed upon by multiple agencies and the general public. Your previous edits describing the region as Plymouth County locations except Cohasset in Norfolk County fits one of the definitions listed, but not others which include parts of Norfolk other than Cohasset. The lead, which was edited seeking to maintain common ground, has been stable and that is because we have aimed for a very neutral definition of the region. Please discuss any proposed changes to the lead on the article talk page. Thank you – Sswonk (talk) 13:13, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Dark Side of the Moon

Due to your recent activity editing The Dark Side of the Moon, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking just a minute to add your opinion to the discussion at Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon#Why must an unreleased EMI remaster be mentioned?. Thank you, Dismas|^(talk) 01:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your OPPORTUNITY to either oppose or support Qwyrxian in his bid to become an administrator...

Hi, I would like to hear what you have to say about Qwyrxian, and here's your chance to do that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Qwyrxian. CHEERS! Diligent007 (talk) 16:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThisPageDoesNotExist-WikiWikiWeb.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThisPageDoesNotExist-WikiWikiWeb.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Palmcards 2010-12-07 101125.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Palmcards 2010-12-07 101125.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:TL club house.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TL club house.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]