User talk:S.zielinski

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, S.zielinski. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Geoff ^{Who, me?} 16:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Orphan Black. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010,

I am not engaging in an edit war. I say this because the person editing the Orphan Black Premise/Overview/Concept section, edits to which I object, is merely reverting to an earlier version of that section that is mostly my work, claims that I am violating the style sheet although I have yet to find any comment by him showing what, exactly, he finds a problem. His edits are forcing me to choose between an earlier and later version of the section which is mostly composed of my work. To my mind. the fair resolution to this dispute would have my latest version reinstated and my critic invited to discuss the issues in the talk section. He adds nothing, he only erases.

Regards, s.zielinski 04:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Editors are expected to discuss there problems,You should read WP:Bold, Revert, Discuss, - You were Bold by inserting the newer version, You were Reverted so now the next thing you should do is Discuss,

If both of you can't find a resolution the next best thing is either WP:30 or WP:DRN,

Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What problem or problems? Respond to what, exactly?

s.zielinski 15:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Explained here, and I'm a she. Flyer22 (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]