User talk:S.s.Grigera

This is S.s.Grigera's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miro Analytical (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need in-depth by reliable unaffiliated sources. Most of the sources are brief mentions, is affiliated with Miro or otherwise authored by Miro.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miro Analytical and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S.s.Grigera! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miro Analytical (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read through linked information above. "Multi-species trace gas sensing with dual-wavelength QCLs" is not an independent source because it was written by those affiliated with Miro, nor is ETHZurich as all they are doing is regurgitating Miro's website and the government is a primary source. If resubmitted without substantial relevant improve the draft may be rejected, meaning it will no longer be considered.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miro Analytical and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, S.s.Grigera. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 18:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello S.s.Grigera. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:S.s.Grigera. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=S.s.Grigera|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 08:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

dear 331dot,

thank you for your answer. I added my employer which has no affiliation with MIRO Analytical, nor I have affiliatioin. I am not compensated for adding new information. This is voluntary work. I saw this company during a conference and think they are helping to combat climate change. Also I like new tech companies and like to support them. If you have any questions, please let me know. S.s.Grigera (talk) 07:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your request for proper display, but if you have no affiliation with Miro Analytical, they aren't a direct competitor of your company, or you aren't paid in any manner to make edits here(such as by an ad agency), then you don't need to declare your employer unless you intend to contribute about them.

You uploaded the logo of the company and claimed that the company has released the copyright to their logo under the Creative Commons 4.0 license- this means that the company has made the logo available for anyone to use and sell as long as attribution is provided. Their website claims copyright of the contents of its website(including the logo) without indicating the Creative Commons license(which must be explicitly stated). If you don't work for the company, how did you obtain their logo? Did you contact them and get them to release it under CC 4.0?

Most new companies do not merit article- a company must typically be established and recognized in its field by independent reliable sources in order to draw the coverage needed to support an article. Most coverage of new companies is of interviews with the founders or announcements of its activities, which do not establish notability. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot, thanks for the feedback. Yes. I have no affiliation with MIRO and I am not paid in any manner. My work is fully voluntary. I am worried about our climate and I think that the company MIRO can help to show the climate change (gas)

Regarding the logo, I contacted MIRO and they provided a low resolution png with their logo. I found some early articles from Empa (independent swiss material reserach institute) about MIRO: Empa - Communication - MIRO sensor

The company received relevant funding for the development of a gas analyzer which helps to monitor greenhouse gases and air pollutants from the Horizon 2020. This shows that the work of the company is relevant: One device to measure the most important air pollutants and greenhouse gases at once | Envirolas | Project | Fact sheet | H2020 | CORDIS | European Commission (europa.eu)

Further the company is mentioned in some scientific papers as you can see from their website (there are also papers without involvement of the founders of the company): Scientific Literature - MIRO Analytical (miro-analytical.com)

Please let me know if you have any further questions. S.s.Grigera (talk) 08:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you communicated with MIRO about obtaining the logo, that could be considered a conflict of interest(an unpaid one) that you should declare. Articles are typically written without any involvement from or even the knowledge of the subject.

I think that you need to have the logo deleted from Commons and upload it to this Wikipedia directly as a "fair use" image. This does carry some restrictions(fair use images cannot be in drafts) but would be the proper license, as I don't think the company released their logo for anyone to use with attribution(it would at least be unwise for them to do that). 331dot (talk) 09:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

dear 331dot thank you for your advice. I proposed deletion of the image. File:MIRO LOGO - 1024px.png - Wikimedia Commons

I am sorry that I am unexperienced with the regulations of wikipedia. But I did not figure out where I can mention that I asked for the logo. I hope my the content will not be deleted because I asked for the logo. Do you think I can proceed to resubmit the article for review? S.s.Grigera (talk) 13:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that you have address the concerns of previous reviewers, you may resubmit it. 331dot (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot, thanks for your support. I resubmitted the page for review. S.s.Grigera (talk) 09:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miro Analytical has been accepted

Miro Analytical, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ortizesp (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]