User talk:S.C.E.M.

Username concern

I hope that I don't seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: your username appears to the name of a company, based on the edits you've made. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your views, for instance, your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

There are several options available to you:

We can talk about it, here.
If we can't resolve this on our own, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. Â·Â·Â·æ¥æ¬ç©£^? Â· æç¨¿ Â· Talk to Nihonjoe 01:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Because Wikipedia does not allow any form of spam or other promotion of people, products, companies or other groups (even non-commercial or charitable ones). Using Wikipedia for such purposes will result in the blocking of the account involved. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for our policies about this.

In addition, user accounts are for individuals only, not for companies or groups or other collective editing. Your username should reflect this. Usernames that appear to be promotional (such as those that make reference to a company or product) violate our username policy and are typically blocked to enforce that policy.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message box.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Tell us what new username you want to use. Please make sure that your new username does not violate our username policy and check that it has not already been taken (click here to search).
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If instead you believe that you have been blocked by mistake (i.e., you have not in fact been using Wikipedia for promotional purposes), please write {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message box and replace the text "Your reason here" with the reason why. See also Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information. Cirt (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Username concern"

""""I hope that I don't seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: your username appears to the name of a company, based on the edits you've made. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?""""

Im sorry if I am in violation of a username policy. I was honestly unaware I was doing anything wrong.

""""I'd appreciate learning your views, for instance, your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.""""

"""""That name is the name of my company in the article I wish to have published.""""

Again I did not know you couldn't do that I just assumed since no one else would know this information who better to write it then the person that it's about. I mean nobody else would even know this information so who else could possible provide it? I simply noticed all the other mass amount of music bios that currently are published and thought adding mine is no different then what's already published right now.

So I guess I am a little confused here, is it just strictly my USERNAME the issue or my article or both? I want to do what ever I can to make this right and never published my article with the intent of self promoting. I was only providing the information all related to the topic. So if it is my article how is it any different then all the other music bios that are currently published now?

So I do hope we can clear up this confusion, I would very much like to get this resolved.