User talk:Rzombie1988

Welcome

Hello, Rzombie1988! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Fabrictramp (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Grand Tour General Classification results timelines

Sterling work on these tables. I hope you don't mind that I have started a discussion at WP:CYC about which riders these are appropriate for. Obviously, your contribution would be very valuable. Kevin McE (talk) 19:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yukari Omori

The article Yukari Omori has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jumbo Hori

The article Jumbo Hori has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Jumbo Hori, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jumbo Hori

The article Jumbo Hori has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Yukari Omori, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yukari Omori

The article Yukari Omori has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Yukari Omori, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Yukari Omori shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've already violated WP:3RR at Yukari Omori so I would not advise you to continue to edit war over the BLP Prod tag. If this is brought up at WP:AN3, you will almost surely be blocked for edit warring.

As explained to you at User talk:Robert McClenon#So Japanese wikipedia isn't reliable huh?, no Wikipedia article is considered to be a reliable source for any other Wikipedia article, regardless of the language it is written it. So, if you really want to have the BLP PROD tag removed, then you need to provide a citation to a reliable source. The source does not have to be in English and it does not need to be online, but both of those things will help others verify the reliability of the source. Only one source is needed to remove the tag, but the more you can add to establish the subject's Wikipedia notability, the better. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look keyboard gangster. I don't care. Go fix it yourself or something. I'm not interested in playing with the butt-slappers club and I have much better things to do.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 (talk • contribs)

@Rzombie1988: This is your last warning regarding civility. Start acting like a grown up and take responsibility for your contributions or you will be blocked. I have the block window open right now. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can slam it home Rzombie1988 (talk) 06:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nancy Kumi

The article Nancy Kumi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines you need to pay attention to

"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research.
A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Biographies of persons assumed to be alive are held to especially high standards of verifiability -- all unsourced information may be removed, no matter how plausible.
Users should never make personal attacks on others. It's a good idea to avoid commenting on people, but on content, and then if necessary, actions.
Noone owns any article here, or even their edits to articles. At the top of the edit page, it says "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone," which means that if you don't want someone to change or even remove what you add, then you need to use another site.
Don't edit war. Except in cases of clear-cut vandalism, do not revert changes to a page more than 3 times within a 24 hour period.
Assume other editors are here to help as much as is possible.

If you do not care about editing as much as you pretend to in your messages to others, then log out and quit wasting our bandwidth. If you want to be in the right on this, then you need to start citing sources and quit begging to be blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or what? Are you going to block me? You might be able to powertrip other people with your keyboard gangsters, but I don't care.

Rzombie1988 (talk) 06:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes I will block you

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh noes~~!!! How will I ever do things for free that don't give me anything in exchange again? The horror! Rzombie1988 (talk) 06:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like, I can also revoke your talk page access. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh noes, anything but that! How can I ever live?

You and the little keyboard gangsters got owned tonight. And wasting the time of no less than the 4 of you made it oh so sweeter.

Also bet 10-1 you'll write something smart after.

Rzombie1988 (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs do not count as reliable sources -- we don't care what monkey scratches appear on them. That's been explained to you, and yet who was it that failed to understand that? Everyone else understood it, or else they wouldn't have explained it.

Now, I get that you're trying to save face by pretending to not care, but the fact that you keep posting (and are trying now to cite sources) proves that you do care. If you didn't care, you'd've never logged in to begin with, and you wouldn't have puffed up your chest and acted all tough when people asked you to cite sources, and you wouldn't have tried to cite sources after getting blocked.

Let's think about this. I'm going to be on this site anyway (I teach English in China and school is currently on break), so I'm not wasting my time here. You keep talking as if you don't want to be here, and yet you stay. Who's making you stay here? Certainly isn't anyone but you. Who's still able to do what they want? Certainly isn't you. Who's being up-front about their attitude here? As I've just explained, it's really not you. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I could read that mess but it's okay, I like knowing I made you waste a few minutes to write that for me to not read it.

Personally, I enjoy the thrill of pwning people. Rzombie1988 (talk) 06:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not paying attention to evidence that you're wrong isn't owning. Last chance before your talk page access is revoked. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your call bro. You took someone who wanted to make the place better and now hopes it gets worse. W2G. Rzombie1988 (talk) 03:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jumbo Hori

The article Jumbo Hori has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable English sources, even the Japanese Wikipedia doesn't even have reliable sources (just a claim that she said something about her size).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd delete it myself if I could.

Now I know why the wrestling section on this website looks identical to how it did 10 years ago and it's thanks to people like Ian.Thomson.Rzombie1988 (talk) 03:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Jumbo Hori|concern= The website focuses on power trips over information.

You've gone on about pretending to not care and acted like you don't want to be here, and yet you made a sockpuppet account and continue to log in here to complain. You've bragged about "owning" people (by being blocked like a common vandal after throwing tantrums because you couldn't follow simple instructions), and yet you're complaining about power trips. Whether you're just trolling or you really are that much of a petulant child, it doesn't matter -- talk page access revoked. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]