Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:InstallBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I just noticed the instructions in your talk page asking to respond in my talk page, so sorry if you see this duplicated, it is not meant to rush you but to try to follow the proper instructions :). I'm pasting below the original message I added to your page:
First of all, thanks a lot for taking the time in reviewing my changes. I tried to fill up as much information as I could to provide reliable sources but I'm not sure if they do not qualify as reliable or that I missed any reference. Could you check if the latest edit status is correct or, if not, pointing me to one specific source that may be problematic so I can review that and the rest and try to solve the issue? Thanks! Ryotakatsuki (talk) 16:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ryotakatsuki!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waqar💬16:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Grabup were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
It require in-depth covarage from multiple independent secondary reliable sources to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:InstallBuilder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
