User talk:Ryn AAPB

Welcome!

Hello, Ryn AAPB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Woerich (talk) 15:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A more personal welcome

Hi Ryn,

I posted a welcome template to your talk page just to provide you with some links to policies that may be relevant to you. I notice that you did disclose your relationship with AAPB on your user page, which will be appreciated by other editors. I did not see anything problematic about your edits so far - even though they appear to involve the subject you have a relationship with - so I didn’t revert them. However, you may want to go through some of the policies included in the welcome message I left, to help you avoid potential trouble later on. Woerich (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on American Archive of Public Broadcasting

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from the organization's website, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ryn AAPB, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ryn AAPB! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

23:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, Ryn AAPB. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, please don't post links to your employer; make requests and suggestions of that nature in the Talk page of the article so other editors who do not have a conflict-of-interest can evaluate the request and possibly make the edit. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 19:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ElKevbo, thanks for your due diligence on Wikipedia editing. My user page states my nonprofit organization and conflict of interest. I make edits as someone under Wikipedia's GLAM category, professionally affiliated with an institution in the cultural sector (such as a museum, library, archive, public art gallery or similar). These folks are "are a custodian of our cultural heritage, which places you [them] in a unique position to improve Wikipedia." I am collaborating with the Wikimedia Foundation to encourage the growth and development of free content, and to provide content of wiki-based projects to the public free of charge. I wish to be respectful of the platform and only pursue engaging with Wikipedia to strengthen the encyclopedia's knowledge. I hope that helps clarify my edits. I will be sure to add this to my user page, as well.

Ryn AAPB (talk) 20:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I get that and I appreciate your work. But I don't think that nullifies either our COI policies or broader COI concerns and best practices. I'm sure that in most cases other editors would be happy to add or incorporate your organization's materials into articles; I just think it's a clear conflict-of-interest for you to add it directly yourself.

If there has been other discussion of this topic and consensus that differs from my understanding, please let me know! ElKevbo (talk) 21:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ElKevbo. Ryn AAPB is editing in accordance with GLAM-Wiki. Many GLAM professionals and WIkipedians-in-residence work to improve WIkipedia using their organizations' resources, as this user is doing. American Archive of Public Broadcasting is active in GLAM-Wiki and has hosted edit-a-thons and editing events aimed at encouraging attendees to engage with Wikipedia. A similar practice can be seen on the Smithsonian's GLAM project page which lists employees working to improve Wikipedia using the Institution's own resources. Ryn AAPB is also editing in compliance with COI: GLAM which states:

Museum curators, librarians, archivists, and similar are encouraged to help improve Wikipedia, or to share their information in the form of links to their resources. If a link cannot be used as a reliable source, it may be placed under further reading or external links if it complies with the external links guideline.

Since the user is engaging as part of GLAM-wiki, which allows staff from galleries, libraries, museums and archives to edit and share resources, than the user should not be considered to be in violation of COI. Ariel Cetrone (WMDC) (talk) 13:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ariel Cetrone (WMDC): Thanks for the clarification. Can you please help me find the community-wide discussion that resulted in this addition to the COI policy? Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

dead links

Please don’t remove these as they can easily be replaced in many cases with a link via the Wayback Machine. Gleeanon409 (talk) 21:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elaine Noble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WGBH. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]