User talk:Ryker-Smith
Welcome
[edit]
|
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for the welcome. It'll take some time to correctly learn all the rules... :-) Rykersmith (talk) 12:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Unusual Division of Tipperary
[edit]reply left on my page Laurel Lodged (talk) 18:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure but in my opinion user Kingroyos is doing biased POV edits on the Murder of Michaela McAreavey article.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. Ryker-Smith (talk) 10:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- In my opinion something radical is needed to save this article into not becoming a Pro-Mauritius-anti-Ireland article. Like reverting Kingroyos edits and have a consensus discussion about them all at the talk page.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- There does seem to be a leaning towards this becoming a pro-Mauritius/anti-Ireland article. While I do not consider that to be an acceptable outcome, neither do I consider it right for this to become pro-Ireland/anti-Mauritius; which I suspect is the majority view and undoubtedly your own too.
- Multiple reverts based on who made them can be seen as ad hominem - and not justifiable if we take Kingroyos edits as good faith. Also to be considered is the WP prohibition on that level of reversion; there are reasons for that policy and I instead believe that changing errors and inaccuracies as they arise will lead to a better article.
- The difficulties seem partly to arise from conflating: (inclusion of references to suggestions of a tourism boycott) with (those suggestions themselves). It is possible to understand how any Mauritian could be angered by those suggestions and how those issues naturally conflate; after all, the average Mauritian is as revolted by the events as anyone else. It is therefore easy to understand any defensiveness that has arisen.
- It is also easy to understand how many Irish people are angered by the failure of the Mauritian police to investigate in a manner that would lead to successful prosecution of the guilty party - whoever that may be. Irish people are naturally angry at this failure to find justice.
- If wording can be found to clarify the facts while steering between these concerns the issue may naturally resolve without 'radical' action.
- I agree that the talk page is the place to build consensus.
- Ryker-Smith (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- In my opinion something radical is needed to save this article into not becoming a Pro-Mauritius-anti-Ireland article. Like reverting Kingroyos edits and have a consensus discussion about them all at the talk page.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Events happening in Dublin
[edit]Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here. Smirkybec (talk) 23:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)