User talk:Rye-96/2016

Archives

2014, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019 onward

2016 Talks
The following discussions belong to 2016.
Use Archives to find the older or newer ones.

Betascript

You added a book by Betascript to source Nasir ol Molk Mosque but those books are copied from Wikipedia and not reliable sources. Watch out for similar books in Google Books searches, see WP:PUS. Fences&Windows 00:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that. Thank you for your edit.
–Rye-96 (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of comma in English

Please see MOS:COMMA and WP:TQ for proper uses of the comma.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 23:45, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WilliamThweatt: Thanks for sharing that. I've been using the American way all along. Didn't know it was regarded illogical here.
If this is the standard Wikipedian formula, I'll have to reform the entire article then.
–Rye-96 (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Hey, you should check some of the most recent additions to this template, lol. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon: He needs to slow down. I'll clean up that template soon.
–Rye-96 (talk) 08:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aight. ;-) Btw, would you mind leaving your opinion here? [1] - LouisAragon (talk) 15:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just participated.
–Rye-96 (talk) 21:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Persian people page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.
—Rye-96 (talk) 03:55, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion

Since you're an active editor on Iranian/Persian topics, would you please help us here? Talk:Persian_Empire#Issues Needs your comment, because we want to reach a consensus. Regards. --Wario-Man (talk) 15:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wario-Man: I just left my comment. Thank you for letting me know about it.
—Rye-96 (talk) 22:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iran Geography

Hi. You reverted my edit in page Iran and you stated the reason as "Unfit. Lies outside the line". Please explain what lies outside the line? As I see, The last 3 photos (Sepiddasht, Hormuz Island and Polond Desert) lie in the 3rd line. It depends on the font size you use and should not be a criterion. Regards.--Mostafa 21:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@M samadi: Hi.
Well, that's how I see that in my desktop version. You're probably right; that was not a quite logical reason.
But don't you think it's a little bit too much to have three images showing deserts? I mean, we already have images of the two most well-known deserts of Iran. Don't you think that's enough for showing the presence of deserts within the geography of the land?
We could go on with tens of other images like that within that gallery, just because they exist too, but that wouldn't be logical. Don't you agree, Mostafa?
—Rye-96 (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About the number of images from deserts of Iran, if you see, now there are four images for mountains of Iran, two for jungles, etc. That section is for Geography of Iran and should be devoted to mountains, jungles, deserts, rivers and so on. Furthermore, there was not any image from east of Iran and Great Khorasan before and the high quality image from Polond Desert could be a good sample for Geography of Eastern Iran.--Mostafa 20:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@M samadi: Alright. I agree with the no image from the east reasoning.
—Rye-96 (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reply was modified on August 13, 2018.

Thanks for your consideration.--Mostafa 18:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Achaemenid capital cities

Hi, this edit was based on a source already entioned in the article: [2] --Z 19:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ZxxZxxZ: Consider leaving summaries for your edits. And do some research on the issue if you're to discuss it.
Pasargadae was the first dynastic capital, under Cyrus II.^[1]^[2] Persepolis emerged later under the reign of Darius I.^[3]

^ Richard Nelson Frye. "Achaemenids". The History of Ancient Iran. p. 124.
^ Lukonin, Vladimir. Ivanov, Anatoly. "From Antiquity to the 19th Century". (The Lost Treasure) Persian Art. p. 26.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Cambridge University Press. "The Consolidation of the Empire and Its Limits of Growth under Darius and Xerxes". The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 10. p. 80.

—Rye-96 (talk) 10:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so we should keep all of the city names. --Z 16:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Richard Nelson Frye. "Achaemenids". The History of Ancient Iran. p. 124.

[2] Lukonin, Vladimir. Ivanov, Anatoly. "From Antiquity to the 19th Century". (The Lost Treasure) Persian Art. p. 26.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[3] Cambridge University Press. "The Consolidation of the Empire and Its Limits of Growth under Darius and Xerxes". The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 10. p. 80.

[1]

[2]

[3]