User talk:Ryantheravensfan1

Ryantheravensfan1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Ryantheravensfan1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 D.C. United season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States men's national soccer team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. – Michael (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 11:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited D.C. United results by opponent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waterhouse and Tauro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Do not remove large portions of text that are supported by reliable sources. If you disagree with any of the sources, please talk about it on the talk page instead of continuing to remove the information. Your claim must be supported by reliable sources, which Wikipedia is not one of.

Thank you. Pyrotle {^T/_C} 02:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkbeast I will report you for vandalism and misinterpretation of sources and manipulation if this contintues

Here you want a credible source citing this fraud http://comm.colorado.edu/~jacksonj/research/coon.pdf

There and I am reporting you for this.

Edit warring

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Pinkbeast (talk) 11:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Riffian people has been fully protected to stop the edit war. See the result at WP:AN3#User:Ryantheravensfan1 reported by User:Pinkbeast (Result: Protected ). You don't ever seem to use article talk pages. This can become a problem if you are reported again at AN3. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Riffian people

Please explain your concerns and edits at talk:Riffian people. As noted above, I protected the page due to the edit warring and the absence of any discussion on article talk. Vsmith (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Blocked for 48 hours for personal attacks on talk:Riffian people and User talk:Pinkbeast in addition to recent edit warring. Vsmith (talk) 03:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to European American may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

org/sites/default/files/datahub/MPIDataHub-Region-birth-1960.xlsx www.migrationpolicy.org]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manhattan Project. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On Portuguese people, please note, "do not use articles from Wikipedia as sources", per WP:CIRC. If you have a reliable source, add it. If you don't, then stop reverting the edit. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:31, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Baltimore Ravens, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 04:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Make a drastic change without an wp:edit summary or cite, expect a revert. Cheers Jim1138

Drastic change are you serious? It's outdated, it's an update. Its easy to look up. It's common knowledge.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ryantheravensfan1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ryantheravensfan1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]