User talk:Ryan barnes 1963

May 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tak: The Great Juju Challenge have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tak: The Great Juju Challenge was changed by Ryan barnes 1963 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890714 on 2024-05-22T05:09:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging

Hi — please don't tag a whole bunch of pages with a rewrite template; it doesn't actually help to build the encyclopedia. I think that you should spend some time adding constructive content before you tag any more articles. Toughpigs (talk) 07:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Your tags don't make sense on their own. A number of the articles appear to be fine. Please stop tagging articles until you've spent more time learning how Wikipedia works (same goes for that deletion nominations that is headed for a quick-fail because you didn't even give a reason). You can raise concerns about how an article is written on article talk pages for now. Sergecross73 msg me 10:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thirded. Noticed a series of completely bogus AfD nominations with no rationale whatsoever. You will likely be blocked if you continue per NOTHERE. TheBritinator (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I understand it takes time to learn how Wikipedia works, but at the same time, your disruptive edits are too much, too fast. Any more bad tagging or bad deletion nominations in the short-term, and your account will be temporarily blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 16:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really. Please stop your disruptive AFD nominations now. Skynxnex (talk) 02:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is blocked indefinitely until you start sufficiently addressing all these talk page concerns. Sergecross73 msg me 02:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ryan barnes 1963 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was trying to create an article but someone blocked my account can you please unblock me! Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 03:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block; please tell us what was wrong with your editing, what you will do differently, and what constructive edits you intend to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This block was...not an oversight or a mistake. You've done nothing but sloppy and erroneous deletion nominations, and questionably vague tags, on articles so far. You refused to address this, so a block has been enforced to stop these disruptive edits. If you want to discuss changing how you edit and a plan for the future, I'm open to discussing. But unblock requests that don't even address this are not going to work. Sergecross73 msg me 15:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ryan barnes 1963 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i'm sorry for making disruptive editing i will never do it again Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Making a new account to evade your block, as you did with Ryanbunny2007, harms your chances. Nothing here specifically addresses the numerous problems you've caused. Yamla (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ryan barnes 1963 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Dear Sergecross 73,

I am writing to request an unblock on the English Wikipedia. I understand that I was blocked due to disruptive editing, and I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused. Since the block, I have carefully reviewed Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to ensure that my edits are compliant with them. Additionally, I have refrained from any disruptive behavior and have focused on making positive contributions to the encyclopedia.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could consider unblocking me on Wikipedia." Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Decline. This is clearly AI generated, compared to many other statements from the user. Along with the socking and continued disruption, as well as having been informed by Sergecross that you have emailed asking him to proxy further disruptive AFDs, I don't think you should be editing Wikipedia. -- ferret (talk) 18:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed further abuse of multiple accounts with Spongebobfan2007. I strongly recommend declining this unblock request but will leave it to the next reviewing admin. --Yamla (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC) Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 04:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Okay I Will Accept It! Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 04:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Just noting for the record, this user is probably User:RyanBarnes2007. -- ferret (talk) 18:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ryan barnes 1963 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Hi, I've noticed that I've been blocked for disruptive editing and having multiple accounts. I apologize for any harm caused and assure you that I have resolved the issue. Moving forward, I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and contributing positively to the encyclopedia. I would appreciate your consideration in lifting the block on my account. Thank you."Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declining. Just checkuser blocked another sock. The user is WP:3X now. -- ferret (talk) 22:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the next reviewing admin, please strongly consider revoking talk page access to prevent all of us wasting even more time here. --Yamla (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As ferret mentioned, this editor had the audacity to email me asking to create a rationale-less AFD nomination on their behalf. They absolutely do not understand the problem here. Probably one of the worst CIR red flags I've seen in recent memory. Sergecross73 msg me 02:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ryan barnes 1963 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Hi,

I'm writing this unblock request to apologise for my actions on the platform. I understand why my account was banned, and regret any malicious behaviour I may have committed by creating multiple accounts while being blocked. I have reflected upon my actions and promise to strictly follow the terms of service moving forward. I recognise that editing is a privilege, and will work hard with integrity to add positive contributions. I hope you will consider unbanning me.

Kind regards,"

Decline reason:

Once you've gone six months without socking, make an unblock request via WP:UTRS. I'm sure you'll have your talk page access restored quickly. In the meantime, follow the advice in the standard offer, including the suggestion that you edit another Wikimedia wiki, such as Wikimedia Commons, Simple English Wikipedia, or whatever. Show that you can follow the rules on another project, and it will count toward showing that you're competent and trustworthy enough to be unblocked on this project. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user has emailed me asking to AFD the Chester Cheetah for them. Giant Snowman 09:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Email access revoked. Emailing multiple users to proxy more disruptive AFDs or to make BLP edits to CTOP areas. Editor clearly does not understand why they are blocked. -- ferret (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]