User talk:RyanGerbil10/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:RyanGerbil10. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Please imagine a different catchy song:

Believe it or not, this page is archived,

Please leave a meesage at this page

Scream all you want, but I'll never hear,

'cause I'm not here-

Believe it or not, it's archived!

Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp

Just to keep you updated, I have split-off one of the article's lists and put another one into table form. Since your objection in the FAC appears to be based on their being too many lists, I hope you will review the article to see if you feel your objection still stands. Thanks! Staxringold 14:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

RfA

I notcied that you participated in the Michael Woodruff featured article discussion, so I thought you mihgt want to vote in the Rfa for Cool3, the creator at WP:RFA. ShortJason 15:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks Ryan, that is high praise indeed! Thanks for your encouraging comments. At one point I actually left Wikipedia for about, oh, I think an hour until Jimbo Wales emailed me and gently told me to pull my head in :-) I must say though, that after having read the text of the Patriot Act my mind has gone somewhat numb. However, if I may be so bold, the Patriot Act is neither so bad nor so good as either the proponents or detractors are spouting on about. Certainly there are aspects to the Act that aren't terribly good (several sections of Title II need amending, and in fact this may have been done by the Patriot Act reauthorization Act - I haven't checked), but a large number of the sections are very much benign.

I think Slate put it best:

"Since almost nobody has read the legislation, much of what we think we know about it comes third-hand and spun. Both advocates and opponents are guilty of fear-mongering and distortion in some instances." (source)

Apt, I must say, and it's the position I currently hold. :-) Ta bu shi da yu 16:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Well.... everyone's different, but here's my criteria for voting someone in to adminship:

Makes a good faith attempt to get an article to FA status
Reverts vandalism
Has at least 2,000 edits
Been on the site for at least 6 months
Is patient, and an all-round nice person (very important!)
Happy to participate
(if at all possible, not crucial) has dealt with disputes tactfully, and kept their head.

So... you are almost there, but you have a little way to go. The big one is attempting to get an article to FA status. For nice-guy factor and enthusiasm, you can't be beat :-) Now get to work getting an article to FA status, or at least get started on it (even good status is great in my book)! - Ta bu shi da yu 19:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Of course :-) Let me know when you've done those things and I'll put you up for RFA. Don't worry about the 6 months thing, incidently. I don't really find that so important, but it does help me gauge how experienced someone is. - Ta bu shi da yu 19:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Ronneburg

Thank you for contributing this article! I have announced it at Portal:Germany/New article announcements and on Portal:Germany. If you write more about Germany-related topics, please announce your articles there. Thank you, and happy editing! Kusma (討論) 03:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes. Thanks very much for translating this. It's great. jmd 01:19, 29 May 2006 UTC

Pashtun people

Hey, thanks for your input. I added stuff to the culture section. Check it out and tell me what you think. Ciao. Tombseye 06:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Roman Naming Convention

Thank you for your comments on this article's FA nomination. I appreciate your input and would like to ask you to check back on the article again, as I have made some improvements. Rrpbgeek 03:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

WP:FAC#Georg Forster

I think I have adressed most of your objections. Please comment, and feel free to find new objections! Kusma (討論) 14:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Dog Day Afternoon

Expanded the lead per your request, hopefully it is enough to garner your support on the FAC. Thanks for the comments either way! Staxringold _talk^contribs 01:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Deconstructivism

Could you have another look and see if you still have objections to it's nomination for featured status? Thanks --Mcginnly 13:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

FA Voting, Royal Grammar School Worcester

Hi, thanks for your comments regarding this FA candidate. I've taken on board your advice, and the article now has footnotes, and one extra reference. I hope the article now meets with your approval for FA, and if not, I would welcome any more comments you have. --Wisd e n17 20:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi, you couldn't e-mail me a screen-shot of the page on your display could you, so I can work out hte best solution to the problem. The page needs lists, and there isn't much scopr in Wikipedia for changing the design of them. I'd welcome any help you could give in that respect (I don't know that much about lists on Wikipedia!). Oh and I feel I must say: why are you using IE!??! --Wisd e n17 22:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Have changed the Houses section, and also added some more info to the article as a whole. I hope that this improves the article for you, and you ability to view it. --Wisd e n17 11:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Just improved the Houses section even more, by adding a picture. The article looks a bit messy though with all these picture on, don't you think? Any thoughts? --Wisd e n17 14:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Cheers, looks better like that. I think that that is probably enough photos for now. In the near future will try and get a picture of Perrins Hall on to the page. Do you think that it is at an FA level then at the moment, as you still have a conditional support, and do you think all of the other concerns raised by Scm83x have been dealt with? --Wisd e n17 14:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: German Translation

Looks a lot better, thanks! I had almost forgotten about that request, came across a few such one line stubstubs while working on subdividing the writer stubs about half a year back and requested a bunch of translations for the ones that had sizable articles in other languages. Good to see they are getting some flesh on the bones now :) --Sherool (talk) 08:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Explanation

In your objection on the United States nomination, you stated how the lead is not comprehensive. Just to make it clear, the lead is suppose to be a short summary, and not every war the country went through should be mentioned. It did talk about the U.S. expansion to the present day 50 states and many overseas territories, before it jumped into the mentioning of the World Wars.--Ryz05 _t 13:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

FA voting

Hello Ryan,

Following extensive overhaul of the article Enceladus (moon), all objections (including the lead) were addressed. Would you mind taking another look at the article and update your "weak object" vote? Thanks! :)) -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 15:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikibreak and graduation

Not quite the same graduation, but a cool picture none the less.

Have a nice Wikibreak, and congratulations on your soon-to-have-occured graduation! That's very exciting! -- Nataly a 18:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

RyanGerbil10/Archive 2, thank you for participating in my RfA. Unfortunately, a great number of oppose voters felt that I lacked experience, and a consensus was not reached (the final tally was 30/28/10). Perhaps I will try again in another few months when I have a few more edits under my belt. If I do, I hope I can count on your support. Thanks again! Cool3 talk 20:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC) (UTC)

A haiku of thanks

Thanks for your support

In my RfA, which passèd!

Wise I'll try to be.

I'm honored that you only have positive things to say about me - thanks so much!

-- Nataly a 04:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Chicago, Illinois - cleanup project

I saw that you had previously worked on the Chicago article and commented on it during past peer reviews and FACs. At the moment, I am in the middle of a massive cleanup project and was wondering if you are able to assist in any way. If so, please contact me on my talk page. Pentawing^Talk 03:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. The tasks that need to be done are listed in a "to do" list on the article's talk page. Pentawing^Talk 05:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Graduation

Congratulations, now you can enjoy your holidays :-) --Ton e 08:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Selena FAC

I quickly fixed the first comment, but I don't understand the second one about the tone. Can you clarify further. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Wilhelm Hensel

Looks great, thanks! Angr (talk) 06:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Binary star

Hi,

Thanks for commenting on the FA nomination of Binary star. I have tried to take care of your objections.

Regards, Nick Mks 18:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Jakobus Morenga

Thanks for the translation, the article is great. --Peta 00:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

United States article nomination

The explanation for your objection is how the lead lacks mentioning about the Civil War, but there now is a mentioning of it, so I like to ask you to reconsider your vote. Thank you.--Ryz05 _t 17:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Chicago climate data

I saw your comment about the climate norms in the Chicago article. I was not the source of those numbers, and I agree they don't match what I've seen elsewhere. I was the source of the avg wind speeds used in the Climate of Chicago article. For that article I used data compiled by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC, part of U.S. Dept. of Commerce). In my opinion, all Wikipedia climate data on U.S. cities should use NCDC data, since that's the "official" government source.

NCDC's policy is to average the last 30 years data, and republish every 10 years. That's one potential cause of confusion, as today's climatological norms for any given city represent the 1971-2000 period. The wikipedian who contributed the Chicago weather table might have been using a different 30 year interval, or maybe an average of the whole meteorological record (130 years or so).

To be honest, I'm not really bothered by the fact that the article's data looks wrong. All weather averages should be taken with a grain of salt. Even before there was any talk of global warming, I think most climatologists recognized that weather is so chaotic and unpredictable that the word "normal" is misleading.InNuce 18:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

JW FAC nomination

You mentioned a few things. I was wondering if you could post some more specific examples of what you're talking about. For instance, you mentioned the lead-in is not long enough. How long do you think the lead-in should be? You also mentioned sections that were too short. Can you give me an idea of what sections you were referring to?

I submitted the article to Peer Review. It got no comments.

Thank you for your comments. joshbuddy^talk 03:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

I've made an attempt to address your concerns. If you have a moment, your review of these changes, and any further feedback, would be much appreciated. Cheers! joshbuddy^talk 18:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Translation

Thank you very much for translating that important article. The translation seems very professional. Good work ;). - Darwinek 21:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey Ryan,

Thanks for the congrats. P.S. I liked the note at the top of your talk page, that's one of my favorite episodes. ;) —Khoikhoi 00:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Nauruan Tribal War

Thanks for translating Nauruan Tribal War. It looks good. The outbreak must have been a strange time! --Scott Davis ^Talk 09:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Super Mario 64

Regarding your nom of SM64 for FAR - you mentioned that you thought it might not comply with WP:MOS. Could you clarify that? Which sections of MOS were you referring to? Thanks! The Disco King 14:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Albertosaurus

Don't suppose you would mind commenting on our Albertosaurus article at FAC, would you? Thanks a lot! Sheep81 11:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ulster and Delaware Railroad

I removed most of the boldface lettering from the article. And what do you mean by "the referencing is insuficcient"? Kschwerdt514 01:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

How do I list the references in different areas but make it so that it doesn't show up as there being 15 references when there are only 4? Kschwerdt514 04:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Poetry

Please revisit Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Poetry; I believe your concerns have been addressed. Thanks, Sam 23:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Chicago, Illinois - now on peer review

I have placed the article for peer review and continued to improve it where ever possible. Could you be able to look at it and comment what else needs to be done? Thanks. Pentawing^Talk 02:41, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Knights of Columbus

Thanks for the comments on the FAC Knights of Columbus page. I've addressed both your concerns, I hope you will support it now! Briancua 05:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Tetris Attack

About the Tetris Attack edits I made, well, I was assuming good faith on your part, Ryan, but I merely just disagreed with some of the changes you made. Sorry if it rubbed you the wrong way, I'm just a big stickler for grammar. Switching between British and American English spellings can, often, and (in this case) does cause edit wars. In essense, the entire thing is pointless--switching the spelling doesn't usually change the meaning anyway. I only switched these spellings back so I could easily make one whole revert (sorry if I was being lazy!). So that's why I switched neighboring and levelling back. I had to switch the semi-colon back because you were using it to separate a dependent clause from the rest of the sentence, and you're supposed to use a comma for this. A semi-colon is not the correct thing to put there. Microsoft Word's spell checker isn't always the best resource for big, obscure words such as "replayability". Try typing a chemistry report--it tells you that every other word is wrong, it seems! Replayability is an acceptable word according to another Wikipedia article. Thanks for bringing up the discussion. I hope this won't lead to an edit war. --Brandon Dilbeck 05:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support

Dear RyanGerbil10/Archive 2,
Thank you very much for your support on my recent RfA. I am pleased to announce that it passed with a tally of 72/11/1, and I am now an administrator. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the tools, but please let me know if there are any admin jobs I can do to help you, now or in the future. —Cuivi é nen 02:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Paper Mario trivia section

Hmm... well, one idea would be to move the information about the Koopa Bros. to the part in the "characters" section where they're listed and to move information that concerns other games to articles about those games. I'm also considering just removing some of the information that doesn't seem very useful or can't easily fit in with the article or other articles.--Conrad Devonshire ^Talk 04:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 19th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 25	19 June 2006	About the Signpost

Foundation hires Brad Patrick as general counsel and interim executive director	NY Times notices semi-protection policy
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages	Undeletion of images now made possible
Adam Carr's editing challenged by Australian MPs	News and Notes: Project logo discussions, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report On Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Message delivered by Ralbot 23:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Town DE

Hi, you asked me to provide a possibility for imperial units on the infobox for German towns. I guess I'd have to make a second version then, that allows for both imperial and metric units. It might take a while, I'll let you know when it's ready. I just added links to metre and square kilometre to the infobox, I hope that helps for now. Markussep 20:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, it was easier than I thought, so I launched the new metric+imperial infobox Template:Infobox Town DE imp, see Holzgerlingen and the template talk page for details. Thanks for drawing my attention to this. Markussep 20:53, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

ff7 nomination

Thank you for the proper comments for opposing the nomination! It helps me and makes me learn more on how to fix it. -ScotchMB 23:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

German translations page

Overhauling this is very necessary, thank you for starting this. I just wonder whether you might also want to change the formatting from

*'''Corresponding English-language article''': something

to

;Corresponding English article: something

which gives a much nicer code display as in

Todesstrafe

Corresponding English-language article: capital punishment
Worth doing because: much more information
Originally Requested by: 82.83.135.84 19:45, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Status
Other notes: That is an epic amount of work - both articles are filled with content... ACH 15:45, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Supported: Support, but suggest to translate the Germany-related part as Capital punishment in Germany. Kusma (討論) 03:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Also, WP:TIE seems to have started using this format. Many people don't know about the ";" thing, it is not widely used in Wikipedia, so I thought I'd tell you about it. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 21:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm not surprised you thought of it, just wanted to remind you to try it before you do a lot of work on it :-) I hope to see the finished product soon, maybe I'll start reading it more often when it is usable again. Kusma (討論) 22:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Good idea, and rename "Other notes" to "Notes". The endless "no english" or "short article" is a bit silly. You need to make sure to understand enough of the intention of the requester to be sure when to remove the article, though. (Or maybe not, and somebody should just remove requests that appear to be done or have become moot by expansion by other means). Kusma (討論) 22:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Back from LA

I'm back and I had a great time. Anonymous__Anonymous 10:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Velociraptor

Fixed your request. I hope you will be able to support now. Thanks, Spawn Man 23:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:FAC

Quibble. Unless you meant squabble? :-) Bishonen | talk 01:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC).

No he didn't mean squabble. I've left you a message at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Belton House. No quabble isn't a word - but I could be pursuaded to think it is if you were to be amanable;-)Giano | talk 07:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Actuary

Thank you for your constructive criticism and comments on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Actuary. I have responded to them there, and would appreciate your response to help me improve the article. -- Avi 02:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Simcity 4

The reason I removed the section is that it is empty. The guidelines for stubs and stub sections are that you don't create it unless you have some sort of minimal expansion on the title. As it stands, the section could be pretty ambiguous - so anyone who edits it may put the wrong information in it (regardless of comments hidden in it). Surely if someone has information about the subject they would create the section anyway. I still disagree that it should be there - it adds nothing to the article at present, we aren't supposed to be using sections as 'for rent' signs IMO. -Localzuk ^(talk) 08:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update

As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Cel es tianpower ^háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Wali khan

hi I am looking for some feedback on an article I am working on.. wali khan was a well known opposition leader and former freedom fighter in pakistan..I think the article needs a bit of copy editing so your feedback will be appreciated Zak 13:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

thanks for the heads up Ryan if you can have a look when you come back..I'd appreciate it ..thanks! --Zak 18:39, 26 June 2006 (UTC)