User talk:Rwlove51

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josve05a was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rwlove51/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 04:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rwlove51, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 04:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Rwlove51/sandbox

Hello, Rwlove51. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The People's Ledger

Hello, Rwlove51. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The People's Ledger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The People's Ledger

Hello, Rwlove51. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The People's Ledger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The People's Ledger (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires additional independent, secondary, reliable sources about the subject. "Bitcoin Magazine" is not considered WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The People's Ledger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Liance (talk) 19:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The People's Ledger (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The People's Ledger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The People's Ledger (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are either Omarova's own papers (sources 1 and 4 in the current version of the draft), unreliable (source 3, Bitcoin Magazine), only tangientially related and not a RS (source 6), or entirely unconnected to the topic (the rest of the sources).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The People's Ledger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 21:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to submitting articles. Are you telling me Darwin's theory on the origin of the species would have been an unsuitable subject for WP until it had been reviewed by "secondary sources"? Rwlove51 (talk) 22:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the person who declined your article, but the answer to your question is, without a doubt, yes. 4.16.149.14 (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your belated opinion on the Wikipedia guidelines. I guess I read them differently, but have since moved on from wikipedia. good luck 2600:1700:A4A8:48A0:6D88:B366:9420:25C4 (talk) 22:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever been published by a law review? I would suggest that requires a significant degree of "notability" ... as does specific mention of your ideas in a Congressional hearing. Rwlove51 (talk) 22:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The People's Ledger

Hello, Rwlove51. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The People's Ledger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

saving and sharing a proposed edit to an existing article before publishing

While using the "visual editor" without signing in, I find no provision for online saving and sharing of a proposed edit to an existing article before I "publish" it. Furthermore, after signing in, I am unable to see how to use the visual editor and it still remains unclear how to save and share the proposed edit before publishing. Pretty clunky for 2024? Suggestions? Rwlove51 (talk) 11:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]