User talk:Rwaring58

Evaluation for King's 2012

1/1 The student has improved the quality of the information available in this article
0.5/1 The student has improved the clarity and/or organization of the content
1/1 The student has clearly explained the method and findings of an empirical paper
0.5/1 The student has correctly cited the empirical paper according to Wikipedia guidelines, and the paper is appropriate (i.e., it is an empirical study on development published the results in an academic journal)

3/4

You did a good job adding the content of his empirical article to the wiki article. You summarized the methods and findings effectively and objectively. However, this was the only one of your three points of improvement that you completed. You can continue to improve this article by condensing/combining the categories. The paragraph that you added is only cited at the title, you should cite within the paragraph so that the reader can identify where the specific point of information came from.

Anewton9 (talk) 20:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rwaring58, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm looking forward to your your contributions to Emotional self-regulation. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lova Falk talk 18:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]