User talk:Rustat99

November 2021

Hello, I'm Robertjamal12. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Memorial (society), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Robertjamal12 (talk) 22:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robert, can you be more specific? I attended one of the first Memorial conferences in 1988 and know people who work for the organisation, now threatened with closure. Rustat99 (talk) 12:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robert, looking at the page today I can see extensive reversion of fully referenced editing, additions and rewriting that took me several hours yesterday. Your work? Rustat99 (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unintentional revert

Hi, sorry for reverting your edits. It was unintentional, I apologize for any inconvenience caused. Thank you -- Robertjamal12 (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phew!

Luckily I don't have a weak heart ...

Rustat99 (talk) 14:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mass graves from Soviet mass executions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levashovo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I'll sort that out today. Thank you for bringing it to my attention, Mr Bot!

Rustat99 (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hi again John. I see that you indicated above that you personally know employees of Memorial, and that they are close friends. The following text is a standard template:

If you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Memorial (society), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Jr8825 • Talk 02:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for my tone; civility; no personal attacks

I apologise for the tone I adopted on the article talk page of Memorial. I presumed you were a relatively inexperienced editor based on your edit count and style. However, I now know this is not the case after seeing your previous account, and I imagine you may have found my tone condescending. I'm sorry if this was the case.

I see this isn't the first COI template you've received, and I do encourage you to read the policy carefully. I also ask that you stop referring to the contributions of other editors as "vandalism" and casting aspersions on others' motivations/anonymity, as you've done on multiple occasions recently. Vandalism is intentional, so these are effectively accusations of bad faith. Please remember that civility is required, and a core Wikipedia policy, and it applies to both talk pages and edit summaries.

Please can you strike through your comment about "ignorant interference", directed towards myself and other recent editors of the page. I consider this a personal attack. I hope we can de-escalate things and cooperate on improving the article. Jr8825 • Talk 03:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have three responses to your numerous remarks, JR.

One, actions speak louder than words. An apology that is not backed up by a change in behaviour is not, in my books, an apology.

Two, I am wary of engaging with people whose identity and background I do not know. This has never been a problem on Wikipedia until now but, for instance, it is quite clear that English is not the first language or mother tongue for some of the volunteer editors whose work you have been defending. The response to their unhelpful behaviour is obvious: Wikipedia exists in multiple language versions and they should, rather, be editing and adapting texts about Memorial (or President Biden) that have been written by their compatriots whether they are from China, Taiwan or indeed Russia itself.

An elderly academic of my acquaintance commented: "I don't trust or read people who don't use their real names." I've stated explicitly who I am. What's the problem with revealing who you are? As a super-competent IT specialist I worked with in this country said: "It's rather cool to use your own name," when editing for Wikipedia or similar sites. I agree.

Lastly, I do not know where you think I have written that I know people in Memorial. I do not recall stating that anywhere in our exchanges. Reference, please, or a prompt apology (of the kind on which you're so keen) for such public misrepresentation. Then, and only then, shall I deal with your latest requests.

John Crowfoot aka Rustat99 (talk) 10:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

re: "I do not know where you think I have written that I know people in Memorial", you wrote "I attended one of the first Memorial conferences in 1988 and know people who work for the organisation" further up this talk page. Jr8825 • Talk 13:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does sitting in the audience mean you know people? If we assume that then "you know" rock artists whose performances you've attended. Not very logical. Rustat99 (talk) 16:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@rustat99 hello from another Crowfoot

John, please pardon me for contacting through this medium. I'm not sure you'll be messaged to an email address you read. It would be good to talk if you do. Tim Crowfoot Cayce poll (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]