User talk:Russiansunited

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. RGloucester — ☎ 15:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gloucester. The question is why does the article about Russians seeking to reunite with Russia, fail to mention the USSR and the break up. This is the origin of the conflict is it not??--Russiansunited (talk) 15:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because that's what we call original research, and not backed by reliable sources. RGloucester — ☎ 15:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Russiansunited, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Russiansunited! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Have inserted the needed </ref> needed in the code.--Russiansunited (talk) 21:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to revert again as am aware of this rule and the abuse of editors to enforce this rule to hide their wrong doing!--Russiansunited (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The POV editors are trying to ban me for NPOV edits of Ukraine conflict entries

I notice that you're an NPOV editor when it comes to Ukraine conflict Wikipedia entries. I am currently under severe attack -- see Haberstr -- for also being an NPOV editor of Ukraine conflict entries. Any comment or support at the Arbitration will be greatly appreciated! Maybe if enough of us protest the obvious, anti-Wikipedia bias, we'll get things moving in the right direction.Haberstr (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CLAIM

Before inserting the word "claim" into articles, please familiarize yourself with the policy at WP:CLAIM. Such edits will be reverted. Capitalismojo (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iryna Harpy's own words quote, "I haven't had cause to speak or write in Ukrainian for well over a decade." Harpy you have an agenda to undermine pro russian in the ukraine article as you clearly have taken a side and your comments reflect this. --Russiansunited (talk) 23:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Iryna Harpy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RGloucester — ☎ 23:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gloucester you from the start refused to allow the word USSR into the article about pro russia which clearly undermines the article. It is you Gloucester who so quickley attacks me. Inotherwords follow your own words and leave me alone, stop your bullying comments like the one you just made. --Russiansunited (talk) 23:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't "bullying", and I don't know what you're going on about. You can't attack editors for the language they speak, nor presume that that language determines their PoV. Furthermore, Iryna cites both Russian and Ukrainian as her native languages, not just Ukrainian. RGloucester — ☎ 23:50, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gloucester you know your comments to edit out any mention of the USSR as a factor in the atricle about pro russia ukraine article. Second you are a bully by your comments, as you are so quick to call for a ban on a editor that barely posts anything. You were waiting to post this ban request as you play this wiki game well. --Russiansunited (talk) 23:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't post any "ban request". You can't make personal attacks. I don't know what you're going on about with the USSR. RGloucester — ☎ 23:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gloucester on wiki you have given a merit of the Ukraine award to editors. Have you not?? Please explain. --Russiansunited (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gloucester you wrote this " this is your only warning ... you may be blocked from editing without further notice" is bullying when you issue merit of the Ukraine awards on wiki. Can you present the pro russia side fairly??? --Russiansunited (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't even begin to take your WP:ASPERSIONS regarding RGloucester and myself seriously. Accusations of being biased from a new contributor who chose to adopt the moniker of "Russiansunited", and has been disruptive on both articles and talk pages by pushing blatant pro-Russian content? One look at your contributions tells the entire story of your WP:SPA involvement here. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harpy please explain the Merit of the Ukraine award given to you on your talk page and if your edits on the pro russian ukraine revolution article earned you this award? --Russiansunited (talk) 00:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I gave her the award because she has common sense, something you seem to lack in your tirades here. It has nothing to do with her being "pro-Ukraine", but about her helping with articles on topics related to Ukraine. If you'll note, all these topics are related to Ukraine. RGloucester — ☎ 00:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Russiansunited, I would ask that you please calm down and stop making assumptions about editors, and that you desist from your WP:BATTLEGROUND approach. Personally, I'm fine with making allowances for the fact that you are new to Wikipedia and have jumped in at the deep end in choosing to work on highly contentious, current affairs articles. I'll even overlook the fact that you removed your attack on my user talk page when it is not considered good practice (please read WP:TPO). I'll take the edit summary provided as an apology, but your comment still remains on permanent record.

For your own sake, if you are serious about being a constructive, neutral editor, please stop jumping to conclusions and assuming bad faith. If you continue to do so, someone will report your behaviour through an ANI where you'll end up being blocked and banned from editing on subjects surrounding Eastern Europe. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harpy, stop your bullying words that their is bad behavior and there will be restrictions. There is a real concern that the award of the Ukraine editors are working as a group to restrict the edits of single editors. That is a real issue which wiki forbids. --Russiansunited (talk) 22:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "real concern". Why do you continue to cast WP:ASPERSIONS? As it stands right now, I'm been bashing my head against whilst being called a "Marxist-Russian agenda pusher". Now I have to do more bashing, because you continue to go on about "working as group". This is madness. RGloucester — ☎ 22:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The merit of Ukraine editors are working as a group to limit individual editors in the article about pro Russian separatists in the Ukraine. Such edits undermine the civil rights of millions of Russians living in the Ukraine as their point of view is restricted in the article. For your information, I am a capitalist and own stock in companies affected by the sanctions against Russia. I support the New World Order and its wishes to have Russia join the EU and Nato. Please be fair about the edits in the article on pro Russian activities in the Ukraine, as the Merit of the Ukraine award editor edits point of view undermine their civil rights. --Russiansunited (talk) 22:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RGloucester — ☎ 22:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. RGloucester — ☎ 23:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Russiansunited reported by User:Iryna Harpy (Result: ). Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

RGloucester — ☎ 00:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your bullying. --Russiansunited (talk) 18:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't "bullying". Can you read English? It says "this does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date". RGloucester — ☎ 18:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you and fellow Merit of the Ukraine editors picking on me??? Please do not post on my talk again, you are NOT WELCOME TO POST ON MY TALK Page Gloucester. I have reviewed your edits and you and your crew have done this to other editors. Be warned this is a violation of wiki policy to work in a group to conduct edit wars, please respect wiki rules Gloucester. --Russiansunited (talk) 00:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since I'm no longer allowed to write to you here, I'll say my parting words. I would like to mention that I've never been inducted in the Order of Merit, sadly. I wouldn't mind the honour, regardless. Farewell! RGloucester — ☎ 00:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 00:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]