User talk:Russian.science
October 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Andre Geim, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Andre Geim. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Therexbanner (talk • contribs) 22:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Andre Geim . Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Andre Geim has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you. Spitfire19 T/C 06:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.
Now, I do see that you also discuss, but you keep edit warring to get that change without being able to convince multiple people on the talkpage. How often now have you changed that while the consensus seems to be the other way. And how long was the article protected to stop editors from changing it and get to consensus on the talkpage. You may be right, but insisting in this way does, obviously, not get you anywhere. I strongly suggest you now stay on the talkpage, and when you do convince the others, that someone else changes the text. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Russian.science:
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 2 weeks as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.
- Due to your clear block evasion, I have extended your block to 1 month. Any further evasion of your block, and it will be extended to indefinite. Regards, –MuZemike 07:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Since you fail to discuss, and continue to evade blocks (as an IP, now) and feel the need to blank this page, I have changed your block to indef, and have withdrawn access to your talk page, you can mail the unblock mailing list if you feel the need to be unblocked:
 | This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. |