User talk:Rush Owen

This is Rush Owen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by IVORK were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rush Owen/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Rush Owen/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Talk 05:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rush Owen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Talk 05:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox: Chaz Hatch

Hello. Just to save you an awful lot of time and effort, I'd like to suggest that you start your draft sandbox article from scratch. At the moment it looks like you've either been told what to say by this person or you know them personally. Either way, you've written a very rambling essay on his life and descent into addiction, not a concise encyclopaedia article based on published sources.

Please read WP:NBIO to understand our concept of notability, and what you are and are not allowed to say about living people. Find sources and use ONLY them to write a two paragraph draft on this man. All the other trivial stuff is unwanted, inappropriate and will never be accepted. You may also wish to re-read Help:Referencing for beginners to understand how to insert inline citations which include urls to online resources. Just a list at the bottom of the page will not suffice for a biography of a living person. To be frank, looking online, I don't think this person meets our notability criteria - but you might find Reliable Sources that do. Put your effort nto finding them (avoiding just local newspapers and insider newsletters) and stick solely to them and there's possibly a slim chance it will be accepted, but certainly not in its present form.

How do you know this person? You've written so much intimate detail about his life without using any published sources that I remain convinced that you're either writing about yourself, your boss, or a close personal friend or family member. Please declare that connection by following the guidelines at WP:COI (or indicate clearly if you do not have one). Because we do not permit undeclared paid editing, please follow the guidance at WP:PAID to ensure you do not breach our policies. Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 09:19, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to be properly referenced - see WP:REFB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rush Owen/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Rush Owen/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Rush Owen/sandbox

Hello, Rush Owen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Rush Owen/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]