User talk:Run4health

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Run4health, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Quality of service. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kvng (talk) 05:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page CSDN has been reverted.
Your edit here to CSDN was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://by-miconda.blogspot.com/2012/02/kamailio-2011-awards.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, though none of Wikipedia's fules were broken in the external link I added to CSDN, I am happy to leave it as you User:XLinkBot have reverted it. I was simply trying to show that CSDN had won an award from Kamailio open source telephony worldwide developers. Run4health (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi Run4health,

I have written an article about a notable company in the field of enterprise software. Could you please take a glimpse at it. Here is the link INSZoom.

Regards, (Writeindia (talk) 04:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Writeindia (talk • contribs) 04:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Writeindia, I changed some language in the first paragraph to sound more encyclopedic in nature. Good luck. Run4health (talk) 21:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BlockDos

The article BlockDos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional tone hides any possible notability this subject might have, most of the many references are useless for determining notability and the 3 that remain are insufficient. See talk page for details.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A-1 Express Delivery Service

The article A-1 Express Delivery Service has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The promotional tone of this submission makes it difficult to determine notability using just what is here. The entire history section looks like promotional material in disguise. The entire awards section looks like non-notable items listed for promotional purposes. Far better to delete and start over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of the notes created by Davidwr regarding the Wikipedia article:

The editor believes the article sounds promotional, especially the history section but also he mentioned the awards section, and because of this, he is not sure if the subject is truly notable.

I agree the history sounds commercial. I have revised the history section to be factual and encyclopedic in tone according to Wikipedia guidelines. The references are solid. The awards are factual such as the Inc one, a fairly notable award, so there is no need to drop this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justfahdi (talk • contribs) 13:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Return My Active User Status

To User:B, User:DeltaQuad, User:Justfahdi, and User:Dennis Brown. My account is User:Run4health. I have not abused Wikipedia. I have a history of editing a variety pages on topics that I am highly knowledgeable about to correct the English and/or to add facts or links to respected audio, video, and text media to support the facts. I also donate to Wikipedia regularly. I use Fedex Kinko's Internet and Cable Internet with a shared network, and mifi Internet with a shared network on different tablets, laptops, and desktops. Editing Wikipedia pages is highly enjoyable for me. The pages I edit for places, people, things, movies, and organizations are notable ones. I do a good job. I ask that my editing ID be unblocked, so I can continue being a part of the vibrant, exciting Wikipedia editing community. Run4health (talk) 16:07, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in requesting to be unblocked, you can use the {{unblock}} template. However, as a bit of free advice, claiming it's a coincidence that other users share your IP is not likely to cut it. Writeindia left messages for you, Javamen, and Suzannebowen. I guess Writeindia just picked three people who edit at Kinko's out of a hat? --B (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Run4health (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First, I am not guilty of using multiple ids. My ID is Run4health. Second, I edit carefully on many pages in Wikipedia because of the joy I experience from working with a global community in areas I am experienced and interested in. I have a B.A. English. Language is my passion. Last, I know hundreds of Wikipedia editors including people in my family and current and previous companies in my physical locations as well as across the USA and other countries. Here in Pensacola, we actually have weekly Wikipedia meetups at Kinkos, area free wifi zones, one of our offices or houses. Do you do that ever? We often take an interest in the same articles. Isn't this true of you User:B, too? I would like my Wikipedia ID to be unblocked. Run4health (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

this is a checkuser block. It would appear that the evidence does not support your statement.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I request other independent opinions regarding the block of my Wikipedia user ID. I need help here. First, I am concerned for the people, places, events, things and companies whom I have edited their Wikipedia pages. They deserve to be listed in Wikipedia even in the midst of this situation and not to be negatively affected by any of this study of my Wikipedia efforts. Second, I will have to cancel the regular local meetups and workshops on Wikipedia markup because I am not able to conduct them as is evident. It is disappointing. Next, the editor User:Writeindia openly asked me to take a look at some article he had added. I did and made some improvements. I do not know this person other than this reference. I have read the definitions of sockpuppetry and other terms that User:B and other Wikipedia editors are referring to in this discussion. I do not take part in those kinds of activities. I am a writer, editor, mentor, trainer, and financial donor to Wikipedia. I believe that I contribute in a positive manner to the project in those five aspects. Please reconsider. Run4health (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BlockDos

The article BlockDos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails to establish WP:CORP notability, lacks reliable sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brandon (talk) 23:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love it if you will delete my contribution and then block me as a contributor. I will still enjoy researching for answers via Wikipedia. 2601:286:C000:4C80:A43A:475D:AE91:2228 (talk) 15:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]