User talk:Rules99
Welcome
[edit]
|
Notification
[edit]Hello, Rules99. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 14:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Also, please stop adding the category that you voted to delete to pages. Thanks. ╟─TreasuryTag►contribs─╢ 14:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Ad-hoc warning
[edit]It is obvious that you are familiar with Wikipedia, so I do not have to provide links to the various policies and guidelines that all point that respectful and collaborative interactions is the agreed method of contributing to the encyclopedia - and that courteous dialogue forms part of that process. This account is being used in a manner that is contrary to the above expectation, and should it continue (regardless of the quality of the edits) will be blocked as being disruptive. Please regard this as a level 3 warning. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Bullshit, no-one else gets blocked for sarcasm or refusal to communicate. Rules99 (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Not true at all. I have personally blocked quite a few people for refusing to communicate. Theresa Knott | token threats 01:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Category:Lists of former entities, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Check it out, I got a "final warning" for removing a {{db-author}} tag. I rule! Rules99 (talk) 11:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)