User talk:Ruggles

Fairly Oddparents

Listen man, you have to stop. There is no evidence that states The Jerkinators was a rating flop. The article you provided as "proof" doesn't even mention the show, so it's not conclusive.

Just let it go, because if you don't, than we'll be forced to bring in an admin. Here's some reference for you in the future:

[[1]] [[2]]

Read through those next time before you get yourself into another situation like this. I'm just trying to help you and help you avoid getting into trouble. I mean no disrespect at all, I'm just giving you some advice. Take it to heart. Thanks.

Image tagging for Image:Cwsmooch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cwsmooch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cwkiss.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cwkiss.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cwsmooch.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cwsmooch.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Strangerer (Talk) 09:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feb. 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to List of The Fairly OddParents characters appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. so sayeth Lucky Number 49 ^{Yell at me!} 12:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of The Fairly OddParents characters, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. so sayeth Lucky Number 49 ^{Yell at me!} 12:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid making statements about the opinions of fans unless you can cite a reliable source. so sayeth Lucky Number 49 ^{Yell at me!} 12:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Stonewall riots, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Legoktm (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. InShaneee (talk) 05:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of animals displaying homosexual behavior because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 05:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Audience scores

I said this already in my edit summaries and I should not have to say it again but Rotten Tomatoes audience scores are not allowed. They are user voted web polls and are not a reliable source. WP:UGC and WP:RS. IMDB votes and Rotten Tomatoes audience scores are not allowed.

See also WP:TVRECEPTION "This means that IMDb, TV.com, and similar websites that give "fan polls" are not reliable sources of information." In case that is not clear enough the Rotten Tomatoes audience score is just another fan poll.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Snoopy Presents: For Auld Lang Syne, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Audience scores are not allowed. -- 109.78.199.168 (talk) 12:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was already true back in 2010 when you previously tried to add Rotten Tomatoes audience scores to a film article and were promptly reverted.[3] -- 109.78.199.168 (talk) 12:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]