User talk:RufousCAT

November 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ternopil has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ternopil was changed by RufousCAT (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885924 on 2014-11-08T12:18:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RufousCAT, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RufousCAT! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Albert Odulele. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bilby (talk) 05:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RufousCAT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, @Bilby:, this account is not a sock puppet - it's my main account. Once I've used another account to make a small but necessary correction in one of the articles I've created - I've found that the founding date of company was not correct. I had to use another account because I had troubles with logging into my main account. But now you may be sure that it will never happen again. I'd like my account to be unblocked and articles to be published back as I wasn't going to make any destructive actions, thanks.

Decline reason:

Based on behavioral evidence outlined by Bilby, I consider it probable that this is a puppet account. In this context, I am declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi RufousCAT. Your editing appears to match that of User:Mamadoutadioukone, who was previously blocked for misusing multiple accounts. It is possible that I've made a mistake, but it was a very close match, so it looks like you are either Mamadoutadioukone or working on their behalf. If you can help with some context, what was the previous account that you were using? - Bilby (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilby:, here is that account User:JohnMeloo. I think there occurred an misunderstanding. 10:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't seem to be the issue, but thank you. Your edits seem a lot like Mamadoutadioukone - looking at your most recent work, why did you choose to create an article for The Towel Depot? It seems an unusual choice. - Bilby (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilby: Sorry for the answer delay, was trying to figure out. I asked the editors I know and nobody uses the nickname you mentioned. The Towel Depot was created by my pal and some time ago I've been asked to finish and publish it. I really believe there is some misunderstanding. 19:46, 20 January 2015(UTC)

No, that doesn't seem to gel. The Towel Depot was created and developed by you in your sandbox before you moved it into main space. It looks like avery clear undisclosed paid editing, and was previously created by someone working for the company. Combined with the same interests and style as User:Mamadoutadioukone, it looks like the same account. I'd consider that you were acting on Mamadoutadioukone's behalf, except that your other edits look very much like his. - Bilby (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]