User talk:Rudram01

July 2023

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Grandhi Mallikarjuna Rao. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) 09:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC) Thank you, have added as per report. Will follow neutral point of view policy. Rudram01 (talk) 09:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nirmala Sitharaman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RBI. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Applus2021 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Applus2021. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 23:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudram01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a retired Indian revenue service person, Rao PV. In general, I used to do the edits by IP address, but I recently created an account that was blocked for unknown reasons. I edit Wikipedia when I feel that the information is very useful to readers. Please check my edits for quality, as the majority of my edits are larger, and let me know if there are any problems with my editing. Please release the block, or can I create a new account?

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. And no, you may not create a new account, nor may you edit by IP address. Yamla (talk) 12:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudram01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for any confusion; please explain how to remove an account from the block and the reasons for blocking the account. I am not related to any party or organisation, and I have not done any substantive or disruptive editing. I always do quality editing. If you have specific problems with any pages, please let me know. I would be happy to follow the guidelines.

If you found any edits related to G20 meetings, then I would be happy to not do those edits again if they were not as per the standards of Wikipedia. I am sure I am not a sock puppet on any account of APPLUS. I have done editing of the New Delhi G20 Summit as it has recently happened and will not edit that page if it is having a problem.

Please remove the block. Rudram01 (talk) 12:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This process you have done is how to ask that your account be unblocked. For unblocking to occur, you must demonstrate an understanding of the reasons for the block, tell us how you won't do them again, and tell the productive edits you intend to make. Specifically, you need to address your use of multiple accounts and problematic edits. 331dot (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudram01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After a thorough reading of the suspected sockpuppets of the APplus Wikipedia account, my account was blocked. Keeping in mind that this account might be related to Applus, by suspicion, because of two pages related to a recent event at the G20 Summit in New Delhi, my account was blocked. It is clearly confirmed by check user Investgator that my account (Rudram01, the name of my daughter) was not linked with any other account. I am here to confirm that I am not related to any of the above sock puppet accounts. I am a retired Indian Revenue Officer and edit quality content for Wikipedia for a larger audience. It is clear that the account was blocked based on suspicion, but further investigation found no link with the Sock Puppet account. Based on the facts, I am requesting that Wikipedia admins unblock my account, as I made quality edits and still contribute occasionally when it is essential. Rudram01 (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per block notice below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Applus2021 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Applus2021. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]