User talk:Rudi Seitz

Welcome from Sphilbrick

Welcome, Rudi Seitz! Welcome! Hello, Rudi Seitz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Sphilbrick, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Introduction The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style Thank you for your contributions to wikipedia, it has helped make wikipedia a better encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! SPhilbrickT 16:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

moved

I moved User:Rudi Seitz/Quadrivial Quandary per your request. Now at Quadrivial Quandary. Please note, if you try to search for it using the search option, it always takes some time, a few hours to a day, for it to show up in search.

Please note that one of the important requirements of an article in Wikipedia is that it demonstrate the Notability of the topic. (While this is a guideline, not an absolute requirement and exceptions can occur, they are rare.) Some may not feel this article has demonstrated the notability of the topic. This can be accomplished by adding references to reliable sources which support the notability of the topic.

You have references, but you might check WP:CITE and footnotes to improve the style.--SPhilbrickT 16:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks SPhilbrick, for the welcome to Wikipedia and for moving Quadrivial Quandary. I will check the style guidelines you mention, and add more references to demonstrate notability. Rudi Seitz (talk) 01:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Just a heads up

Just a heads up - many new editors at Wikipedia assume that when a template is placed on an article (such as the notability one placed on Quadrivial Quandary ), that the editor will be continuously monitoring the progress and will remove it as soon as the objective is reached. While that may happen in some cases, and sounds like a desirable approach, it is rare that it actually happens. The best option is to address the concern, and when you think you have, add a note to the talk page of the person who left the message, (in this case User_talk:Hex and ask them to comment. --SPhilbrickT 16:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again

I appreciate your advice. Rudi Seitz (talk) 21:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)