User talk:Rubensni

Very good edit on the Adare page!

Hi again, although I thought Clonshire was a townland of Adare I am not certain, so your approach is probably for the best. If I can think of a way to include it in sport however, I will if thats ok? Oh yeah, I changed the population from 2592 to 2438 because the yeays were mixed up I think, sorry for not specifyin that on the discussion page- I'm not exactly a seasoned wikipedia editor!

I also have no idea whatsoever what the current construction status is of the new hospital but I feel it would be better off in the Adare Manor page because its a private hospital as far as I'm aware.

Overall I feel the page is looking very good by now, there isn't too much more we could add. I was wondering however if we could maybe post a picture of the thatched houses? I know I'm at the risk of turning the page into a slightly biased advertisment maybe, but I feel that the thatched cottages are one of the nicer (and unique) features of the village.

Also, I might try and add a bit more to the history of the village once I do a bit more research!

Yours, Jordan5nick 29 March 2007

Cottage photo uploaded, I'm using it as my profile pic. There's no copyright issues. Something to consider! Jordan5nick

An Garda Siochana Hi just to let you know you are missing a rank in the Garda Siochana page of Superintendent which is one bar one diamond. Chief. Supt is a bar and 2 diamonds. the Sgt has his chevrons below his numbers. just to let ya know silop

N21

Hi Rubensni - spotted your Adare Bypass article; a suggestion, should it be merged into the N21 article? (Sarah777 21:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I'd also recommend this. zoney ♣ talk 17:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that the Adare bypass article would best remain seperate from the N21 page. I created it as an aside to the Adare page and, if anything, should be merged into that. The bypass is going to impact on Archaeology and the economy of Adare (including property rights) during the construction phase. When the road is completed then I would support merging it into the N21 page. rubensni 16:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Commissioners- Notary Public

Just wondering why you deleted your contrib. on P.C's at Notary Public. I was hoping to link to the current equivelant of the old Irish J.P's RashersTierney (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to gather information on the whole quasi-judical positions (Sheriff, County Registrar, etc.) in Ireland for Wikipedia. Notary public is actually a seperate position in Ireland to peace commissioner, a fact I only discovered after stumbling upon a more reliable source (due to the fact that the law is, as usual, a mess) thus I had to remove the section as it was factually wrong. Rubensni (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic Corridor

Thanks for the map you added to the Atlantic Corridor page. However, there are a number of mistakes on it, not least the N20 which has NO motorway/HQDC built along it north of Blarney. Seighean (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

You're right, got Blarney and Mallow confused Rubensni (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:GUBU

For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. You do this by listing the parents near the bottom of the page, each enclosed in double brackets like so:

[[Category:Political scandals in the Republic of Ireland]]
[[Category:Parent2]]

Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards,--Stepheng3 (talk) 00:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adare bypass as of 2009.GIF

A tag has been placed on File:Adare bypass as of 2009.GIF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shubinator (talk) 23:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:AtlanticCorridor Dec09.png

Thanks for uploading File:AtlanticCorridor Dec09.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An Garda Siochana

Hi just to let you know you are missing a rank in the Garda Siochana page of Superintendent which is one bar one diamond. Chief. Supt is a bar and 2 diamonds. Assit. Commis. is one red circle Dep. Commis is red circle with diamond. Commissoner is 1 red circle and 2 diamonds. the Sgt has his chevrons below his numbers. just to let ya know —Preceding unsigned comment added by 10silop (talk • contribs) 20:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC) --10silop (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)10Silop[reply]

Yeah, that makes more sense than the way I have it. I shall change them. Thanks. Rubensni (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rubensni! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Paul Gillespie (columnist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rennicks

The article Rennicks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No additions have been made since last prod in June 2008. No indication of notability. Many claims unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HighKing (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rennicks

I have nominated Rennicks, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rennicks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:NatlAmbulanceSvs.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NatlAmbulanceSvs.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Countdown to Zero

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Countdown to Zero, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indiewire.com/film/countdown_to_zero. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper Licensing Ireland

Hi, Rubensni, and happy new year. Please see Talk:Newspaper_Licensing_Ireland#.22Threat.22_section when you get a chance. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 10:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reference?

Do you have any references to support this edit (scroll down to film list)? Wikipedia policy allows edits which cannot be independently confirmed by citations to be challenged and removed. — O'Dea (talk) 07:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garda 09.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Garda 09.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garda 05.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Garda 05.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Gillespie (columnist)

The article Paul Gillespie (columnist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Ballyheigue village.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Events happening in Dublin

Hi! As you tagged yourself as being in Ireland, I hope you don't mind me reaching out. We know have a recognised Wikimedia Community Ireland User Group and we have been running workshops and other events in Dublin and beyond. In case you are interested our next event will be this Saturday in Collins Barracks, you can find the details here. Smirkybec (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rubensni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Place any further information here. Rubensni (talk) 10:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to give us your IP address in order for us to investigate your claim that this is not a host. If you are uncomfortable doing so publicly, you can use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rubensni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rubensni. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rubensni. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speed of Sound (Chris Bell song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Speed of Sound (Chris Bell song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 09:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Speed of Sound (Chris Bell song)

Hello, Rubensni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Speed of Sound (Chris Bell song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]