User talk:Ruaidhril
Ruaidhritopia
[edit]A tag has been placed on Ruaidhritopia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 12:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC) DO NOT REMOVE IT RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 12:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Stop recreating the above article, the speedy deletion tag had been reviewed and the page should be deleted RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 13:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am merely getting use to useing wikipedia.I am not familiar with it's workings. The content i am submitting i asure you is nottable. This is merely the start of my research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruaidhril (talk • contribs)
- Leave the tag on and then let an admin decide then, I'm quite sure it isn't RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 13:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Why are you removing the tag yourself?? as author of the article you should not remove it. It will be reviewed in due course by an admin. I'd suggest discussing the article in its discussion page as to why it shouldn't be deleted RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 16:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Leave the tag on and then let an admin decide then, I'm quite sure it isn't RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 13:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am merely getting use to useing wikipedia.I am not familiar with it's workings. The content i am submitting i asure you is nottable. This is merely the start of my research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruaidhril (talk • contribs)
Regretfully I am doing it unknowingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruaidhril (talk • contribs)
- Unless your "research" produces some verifiable references, we shall go on treating the article as an hoax. (Just for the record, here are some edits you have done while not logged in: Special:Contributions/193.1.95.4.) -- RHaworth 23:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
talk page
[edit]- Here is talk:Ruaidhritopia before I deleted it:
This web site defines the term Ruaidhritopia, it's [sic] creator and policies behind the political party. Please feel free to comment on any changes that need to be made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruaidhritopia (talk • contribs)
- Based on this search, the party is either non-existent or so far below the radar that it doesn't come within light years of being Notable. Regardless, content cannot be Verified from any Reliable sources, so the article may not be kept. Fan-1967 16:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Follow those links and you will find they are all Wikipedia and its clones. -- RHaworth 23:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks very much as if the alleged founder, Ruaidhri lennon, doesn't exist either. All references to him are also from copies of this. Fan-1967 23:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- He exists all right - see this pic. It is just that he is the author of the article and his notability is dubious. -- RHaworth 23:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Think that proves non notability in my eyes RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Or the picture could be from an old B-movie. (It does look that way, doesn't it?) I can't find any WP:RS that the guy even exists. Everything I find looks like a clone of this article. Fan-1967 23:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Think that proves non notability in my eyes RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Follow those links and you will find they are all Wikipedia and its clones. -- RHaworth 23:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Ruaidhri_1975.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ruaidhri_1975.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 14:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:Ruaidhri_lennon.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ruaidhri_lennon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 14:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)