User talk:Rua/Archives/2017/August
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rua. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. You ejected my changes. You didn't want to read my explanation on talk page: "Unexplained removal of sourced information. Talk page message is OR." Ok, my explanation is "Incompetent or deceptive information". Why? I can't replace my comment about it. --Ed1974LT (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Your talk page post is original research, which has no place in an article. The information given is sourced, so you should use sourced information also. CodeCat (talk) 20:46, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- My sources are the books:
- Zigmas Zinkevičius. Lietuvių kalbos istorinė gramatika. T. I. Vilnius, 1980.
- Zigmas Zinkevičius. Lietuvių kalbos istorinė gramatika. T. II. Vilnius, 1981
- Zigmas Zinkevičius. Lietuvių kalbos istorija. T. I. – Vilnius, 1984.
- Zigmas Zinkevičius. Lietuvių kalbos istorija. T. II. – Vilnius, 1987.
- Zigmas Zinkevičius. Lietuvių kalbos dialektologija. – Vilnius, 1994.
Do you need I refer to the pages? This isn't WP:OR--Ed1974LT (talk) 21:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Do these books specifically discredit Hill's theory? CodeCat (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, they really do. So do you need quotations (in Lithuanian) and pages numbers? I have wrote why Hill's theory is a nonsense.--Ed1974LT (talk) 21:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- "You haven't provided any specific passages that concern the matter." Do you want I provide Lithuanian text? If you can't refer to more authoritative source that Hill's article, don't prevent me make the changes in the article.--Ed1974LT (talk) 22:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)