User talk:Rtf13

Principle #1 a.

1. Yes, it starts off with a definition which allows you to understand what the article is about.
2. Key points: What Street-Level Bureaucracy is, examples of it, and problems with Street-Level Bureaucracy.
3. It seems that the contribution has been helpful but could use more information.
4. All information has a source to go along with it.

b.

1. The article focuses just on Street-Level Bureaucracy.
2. They have provided scholarly sources.

c.

1. It shows an unbiased view. It allows you to form your own opinion on the topic.
2. Yes, it shows problems with the topic so it shows the opposite view.
3. Subtle distinctions are clarified appropriately.

Principle #2

1. All claims were supported.
2. All sources seem reliable and they have a good amount of sources.
3. Sources are in the correct format.
4. Language is precise and understandable.
5. Nothing seems not sourced at this time.

Principle #3

1. The article has a neutral point of view.
2. The article does avoid stating opinions as facts.
3. Yes, as well.
4. Alot of focus on the definition and the problems with it.

Principle #4 a.

1. So far it seems to be in it's early stages but has a good layout.
2. Sentences are well written.
3. More proofreading could be beneficial once complete. 
4. Yes, it is easy to read and understand.
5. Yes, the word choice is good and allows for easy understanding.

b.

1. The structure of the article is clear.
2. It is well organized and focuses on what seems to be important to this topic.
3. The paragraphs are divided up by topic and seem well structured.

c.

1. Article titles are there and explain each paragraph well.
2. All sections are titled.
3. More links could be helpful.

d.

1. There really are not any pictures provided.
2. No pictures available.
3. No pictures.

Open-ended feedback Questions Question 1: So far it seems that they have gotten down the right information and have a good layout for the article. It is easy to understand and read. Question 2: First, more information could be helpful. Second, Adding for links in the articles, adding further readings or even adding a picture to the article could help.

Nice work!

		The WikiCookie
		You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more.

Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Rtf13 (talk) 16:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rtf13, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rtf13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluating a wiki article

Scull and Crossbones has no information on the topic and the article asks that any relevant info be added in what the scull and crossbones means and represents. So I suppose that since this subject interests me, this is what I would like to work on to contribute to the wiki project.

Welcome!

Hello, Rtf13, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help.

I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]