User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive October 2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Rsrikanth05. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hyundai Sonata
Hi Rsirkanth05,
I am a student at Cornell University and am editing the Hyundai Sonata page as part of a project for a class (INFO 3460: Online Communities). Thanks for the note about the 4th gen Sonata being called the Sonata embera. Do you happen to have a source for this? Also, please let us know if you have any other suggestions for edits to the page.
Thanks, D(QQ)b (talk) 04:07, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- I believe I added that statement when I was new to Wikipedia, around four years ago. I'm not too sure that there is a source for it. The Sonata Embera was a name used only in India, as far as I can remember. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:15, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 October 2013
- Discussion report: References to individuals and groups, merging wikiprojects, portals on the Main page, and more
- News and notes: WMF signals new grantmaking priorities
- Featured content: Bobby, Ben, Roger and a fantasia
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes: After the war
- WikiProject report: U2 Too
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 October 2013
- Traffic report: Shutdown shenanigans
- WikiProject report: Australian Roads
- Featured content: Under the sea
- News and notes: Extensive network of clandestine paid advocacy exposed
- In the media: College credit for editing Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute and Ebionites 3 cases continue; third arbitrator resigns
The Signpost: 16 October 2013
- News and notes: Vice on Wiki-PR's paid advocacy; Featured list elections begin
- Traffic report: Peaceful potpourri
- WikiProject report: Heraldry and Vexillology
- Featured content: That's a lot of pictures
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case closes
- Discussion report: Ada Lovelace Day, paid advocacy on Wikipedia, sidebar update, and more
why did you edited ishant sharma page
why did you removed those funny liners from ishant sharma page.. Why dont you let indians have fun.. This is highhandedness.. You want to project yourself as a person who is neutral and have high values.. Dont dare to do such things again.. If you have that much of guts then go and change the perverted history of srilankan tamils or atleast tamils.. Dont play with us.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvr9995 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Because you make us Indians look bad! --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not an avenue for you to display your 'comic genius' or "have fun" at the expense of the accuracy of the content. Encyclopaedic content that adheres to the policies and guidelines stays. Everything else is tossed out. -- Rohini (talk) 19:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- P.S: I am an Indian. In case you haven't figured out frm my previous message, and since you evidently have not seen my user page. As for the perverted history, point out the errors and they shall be fixed. I don't project myself as neutral and with high values. I am neutral and shall always remain so. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Seems like a personal attack, have warned the editor. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:24, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- P.S: I am an Indian. In case you haven't figured out frm my previous message, and since you evidently have not seen my user page. As for the perverted history, point out the errors and they shall be fixed. I don't project myself as neutral and with high values. I am neutral and shall always remain so. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not an avenue for you to display your 'comic genius' or "have fun" at the expense of the accuracy of the content. Encyclopaedic content that adheres to the policies and guidelines stays. Everything else is tossed out. -- Rohini (talk) 19:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2013
- News and notes: Grantmaking season—rumblings in the German-language community
- Traffic report: Your average week ... and a fish
- Featured content: Your worst nightmare as a child is now featured on Wikipedia
- Discussion report: More discussion of paid advocacy, upcoming arbitrator elections, research hackathon, and more
- In the media: The decline of Wikipedia; Sue Gardner releases statement on Wiki-PR; Australian minister relies on Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Elements of the world
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Moving a page
Hi, thanks for helping after the bad move of Municipal Corporations in India.
However, copying and pasting from one page to another has bad results; we lose track of the edit history, which shows who has contributed what to the article.
I think I have fixed that page now, but please see WP:MOVE if you need to do that again. Kind regards – Fayenatic London 22:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm really sorry about that. Forgive me. I shall ensure it is never repeated. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. We are all still learning! – Fayenatic London 13:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)