User talk:Rsoruss
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Good job
[edit]Good job posting a diff to my talk page. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 03:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Nice comment here indeed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Good job again
[edit]With your recent edits. Regarding this, you were right to remove the bolding, however, capitalization is not needed, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters). I also agree with this, due to consistency with the title, but check Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English for future reference. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
On referencing
[edit]If you cite the same work (page), you can combine references (see how). Try using the citation templates from the pull down menu; and try to add all information (at the very least, author and date, missing for example from the "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media, p.60"). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. To finish fixing the ref, you should add text - for example, "Andreas and Haenlein (2010)" - to the <ref name=Andreas></ref>. Otherwise the system will complain about there being no text for it to display, as it does now. So you want something like <ref name=Andreas>Andreas and Haenlein (2010)</ref>. Or, you could throw the entire cite template there; your choice of a style (just make sure it is consistent throughout the article). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
You had me worried there for a second. I reverted your last edit, in which you accidentally applied the {{rt}}. If you are experimenting with referencing templates, you may want to do it in a sandbox (see WP:SANDBOX). You can create such sandboxes in your own userspace, or adapt your userpage for it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I see what you were trying to do. Interesting template, but I think this may be more functional: [1]. Sometimes, the problem with wiki is that it gives us too many ways to do something like this... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 05:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Social Web
[edit]We have some things to fix. I put some ideas on the talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjc106 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey,
Do you want to talk about the things we have to fix on the discussion page? If your not busy, I was gonna call you. Mjc106 (talk) 16:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)