User talk:Rskovach

Hi! Cdl32 (talk) 00:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox article - review

Hi. I have taken a look at your sandbox article. Overall, it appears well-written and encyclopedic, but there were some issues that I'd like to point out:

Section 1.2 - First paragraph: The subsection goes into a description of the Fidesz party without explaining why that matters; it is better to start using something like "upon the election of (the two-thirds majority) Fidesz party in 2010 ... the government began a 'hands-on policy'". The main focus is the proposed museum project, not the history of Hungary's government.
The line, "It was also suggested" is ambiguous because it does not mention who suggested these allegations...the watchdog? The museum? Or the public?
Be sure to watch for the presence of any weasel words, e.g. some people say that these policies are the worst in history.
Section 2.3 - Second paragraph: "Baán is no stranger to criticism nor controversy" - the tone of this particular paragraph leans more toward a newspaper editorial-style writing, rather than typical encyclpedic tone.
Section 3.2 - It is a good idea to link junk status (currently a redirect to "high-yield debt", a form of credit rating) so that readers unfamiliar with economics are not confused about the nature of this statement.
It may be a good idea to include an opening sentence or paragraph introducing the fact that similar places exist worldwide.
A minor typographical note: instead of keyboard hyphens, the use of the en dash (& ndash ; –)
and em dash (& mdash ; —) are available through wiki-syntax.
The remaining issues are minor grammatical errors, i.e. state owned → state-owned, it's → its (Section 3.4 last paragraph, a common error), and Section 2.1: "a Fidesz campaign platform during to the 2010 elections" – fix this.
Comment: where I live, it is more common to say "tourist site" than "touristic site", though there is likely great variation in different English-speaking parts of the world – is "touristic" more common where you're from?

Overall, the article is well-cited and well-formated using a variety of sources, and is almost ready for mainspace (immediate publishing). Your first article may also have relevant guidelines. Hope this helps! ~AH1 ^(discuss!) 03:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Rskovach, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

art&ethics

Hey, just wanted to pass along the article I talked about in class, which has a list of verbs/adjectives/adverbs to avoid and to help maintain a neutral POV. Another good article offers a list of commonly misused English words. Hope this helps! Azmcsbl (talk) 15:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey

Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 18:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salviati

No, that reference was not put in place by me, and I have never read that book. Sorry. Indrian (talk) 03:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]