User talk:Rruz1986
Talk:Alpha Theta Sigma (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)
reason this image is non-free
Regarding Sancta Maria, Mater et Regina, Seminaruim, I was supposed to type Sancta Maria, Mater et Regina, Seminarium instead of Sancta Maria, Mater et Regina, Seminaruim. It's Seminarium, not Seminaruim.
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sancta Maria, Mater et Regina, Seminaruim, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: St. Pius X Seminary. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit]Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Sancta Maria, Mater et Regina, Seminaruim. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Queenie Talk 17:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:S23rtdg3s.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, File:S23rtdg3s.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MER-C 09:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of File:S23rtdg3s.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:S23rtdg3s.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:S23rtdg3s.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 09:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:La Salle
[edit]I have nominated Category:La Salle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Jamir_Garcia_by_burgerjam.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Jamir_Garcia_by_burgerjam.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bluemask (talk) 07:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:SPXseal.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SPXseal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC) --Xeltran (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Rruz1986, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 18:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated ALv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 10:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
redirects in the mainspace to your userpage
[edit]Please do not create any more redirects from the main article space to your user space. They are against the rules, and are just making more work for others to remove them.--Terrillja talk 12:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:2342sdfsdgfsdfsdsfsf.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2342sdfsdgfsdfsdsfsf.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Terrillja talk 13:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC) --Terrillja talk 13:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:SMMRSLogo.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SMMRSLogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Terrillja talk 13:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC) --Terrillja talk 13:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:FlagofCapiz.gif
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FlagofCapiz.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Terrillja talk 14:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC) --Terrillja talk 14:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Ggerergdfggdr.JPG
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ggerergdfggdr.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Terrillja talk 14:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC) --Terrillja talk 14:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of Jamir Garcia
[edit]Speedy deletion of Jamir Garcia
[edit]A tag has been placed on Jamir Garcia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please do not take this personally. If you wish to contest the deletion, I would advise you to follow the instructions above and add reliable sources to the article as a matter of urgency. Apologies and kind regards,HJ Mitchell (talk) 01:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Notre Dame Educational Association Philippines
[edit]I have nominated Notre Dame Educational Association Philippines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Student7 (talk) 22:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Athetas.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Athetas.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Terrillja talk 00:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Roxas City Inter-Organization
[edit]A tag has been placed on Roxas City Inter-Organization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 06:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rruz1986 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Terrillja talk 01:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Summer Samahan '09.jpeg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Summer Samahan '09.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Terrillja talk 01:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Alpha Theta Sigma (Delta Chapter).jpeg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alpha Theta Sigma (Delta Chapter).jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Terrillja talk 01:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Asophians.JPG
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asophians.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --UserB (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Cosdama.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cosdama.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 15:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Athetas.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Athetas.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 15:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Asophians.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asophians.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 15:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
File:OLMCLC 1990's elementary students.jpg missing description details
[edit]is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Possibly unfree File:OLMCLC 1990's elementary students.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OLMCLC 1990's elementary students.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:AlphaThetaSigma.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AlphaThetaSigma.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)