User talk:Rrtrent500
Your edits to Smash Some Stuff.com
[edit]Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Rrtrent500! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 04:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your edit to Smash Some Stuff.com:
[edit]Your recent edit to Smash Some Stuff.com (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 04:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. This is especially a concern at Microsoft . Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you. Kuru talk 04:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Smash Some Stuff.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 04:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
February 3, 2007
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Microsoft, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)