User talk:Rrosenwald

Speedy deletion of Robert Rosenwald

A tag has been placed on Robert Rosenwald requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Oore (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Poisoned Pen Press, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PPPLogo 72dpi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PPPLogo 72dpi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 04:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Women Airforce Service Pilots. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 21:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Women Airforce Service Pilots, you may be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 00:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - I was unaware (not meant to be an excuse) that mentioning a book we had published that dealt with WASP would be wrong and thought somehow I had messed up on my previous edit in January and that it didn't get inserted. I'll be more careful in the future and try to spend a little more time learning how to use Wikipedia before I post.Rrosenwald (talk) 05:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your response is unconvincing, these edits happen regularly

A Conflict of Interest report has been filed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_47#Women_Airforce_Service_Pilots -CliffC (talk) 03:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How am I supposed to convince you?

Cliff, I have made two edits to this page since I made the initial posting. One in January and one recently. If there have been other edits made to this article by other people then they are NOT by me or even indirectly through my efforts. I do not regularly post to Wikipedia and I do not know how to convince you of that, though I suspect you could determine how many posts I have made in toto to Wikipedia since you appear to be some sort of superuser. I have no idea what the effect is of the Conflict of Interest report and I don't have time to find out. I run a small publishing company and I was trying to help one of our authors who wrote two works of fiction that deal with Women Airforce Service Pilots. I have said, and I mean, that I will try to be more respectful of Wikipedia's guidelines in the future.Rrosenwald (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest (promoting your own publications)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Women Airforce Service Pilots, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --CliffC (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Poisoned Pen

The article The Poisoned Pen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no independent references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]