User talk:Rrodic

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. dci | TALK 01:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 02:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot block me without any valid reason. If I get unblocked, I will block you because you are abusing your editing privileges--Rrodic (talk) 02:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DO I GET UNBLOCKED?--Rrodic (talk) 02:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to abuse your appealing privileges, you talk page will be subsequently blocked. Please stop. hmssolent\Let's convene 02:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe (this is just a wild guess), if you tried reading the directions on the block template, and tried using the unblock template they suggest, providing a proper reason as discussed in the linked guide to appealing blocks and give someone a reason to believe that you'll be of any use to the site, you might be unblocked. Could be completely wrong, though. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even know him. He blocked me before I could block him. He must be a vandal. I cannot edit your(hmssolent\Let's convene) talk page because I am blocked. Please help me get unblocked--Rrodic (talk) 02:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried reading the directions on the block template? A good editor who wasn't a troll would do that. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:41, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try requesting being unblocked that addresses the actual reason you were blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Rrodic (talk) 02:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Accusing an admin in good standing of being a vandal without providing any evidence? Failing to address the fact that multiple people were pretty sure you're a sockpuppet of a previously blocked user? Failing to address that more than one editor openly said you're a troll account? ...Yeah, sure, you're done. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry has been confirmed by a CheckUser. I'll put up the relevant templates if someone hasn't beaten me to it. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First you guys blocked me without a reason, now you guys are accusing me of sockpuppetry, which is very legal by the way. You guys must be sockpuppets

Once I get unblocked, I will put random sock tags on you guys.......tit for tat--Rrodic (talk) 03:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you can tell us all about what we've done wrong from your next sockpuppet account, once you lose talk page access on this one. Which, considering that an admin will come along shortly to review your unblock request, won't be very long at all. À la prochaine. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there must be a way to take the block off this account, I am checking..... After I take the block off this account, I will block you first

Welcome!

Hello, Rrodic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rrodic (talk) 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing admins

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Recent_edits_made_by_Rrodic. Tiderolls 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rrodic. You have new messages at Rrodic's talk page.
Message added 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Rrodic (talk) 02:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hi Rrodic. The following links might be useful if you are considering appealing your block. I'm not sure how likely it is that you'll be accepted, given your recent contribs, but taking a look could help.

I'd strongly encourage you, if your request is accepted, to engage in more constructive editing. As for adminship, look over WP:NOTNOW. Given current circumstances, an RfA is almost bound to fail. dci | TALK 02:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rrodic. You have new messages at DCI2026's talk page.
Message added 03:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks Rrodic (talk) 03:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]