User talk:Rptng03509345

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rptng03509345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see above

Decline reason:

obvious trolling

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

helpme request

The help me tag is not for unblock requests or merely to seek attention. --pgk^(talk) 16:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"(STOP VANDALIZING MY TALK PAGE YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE)" continue like this and I'll protect this page from further editing. wikipedia is not a soapbox and no personal attacks --pgk^(talk) 17:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People will stop reverting your talk page when you stop using it as a soapbox. Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As promised --pgk^(talk) 17:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

I have never taken any action on your account (or any socks of it, to my knowledge) and am uninvolved in the Encyclopedia Dramatica dispute. Do not spam random administrators about your problems. If you have a legitimate issue (and are not blocked), you can bring it up on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Better yet, take it to a forum designed to resolve disputes, such as Wikipedia:Requests for Comment. However, do not email (or even post to the talk of) of uninvolved admins. I will not discuss this with you again. Superm401 - Talk 02:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Tyrenius 18:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same. Postdlf 03:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Spamming people who don't know you implies that you've already made enemies of all the people who do. Not a good introduction. Isomorphic 05:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rptng03509345 / barbecue43564,
Your e-mail, loaded with so-called "vital information on admin abuse", looks like a smear campaign. You didn't tell me who you are and what you need help with in your e-mail. You didn't even sign your e-mail. Sigh. Instead of bothering total strangers, please make use of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. The "evidence" you've collected may be useful there. Good luck. --PFHLai 12:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]