User talk:Rprakashmathur

Your relation with Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina

Hello, Rprakashmathur. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. User4edits (talk) 11:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for leaving this message for the edits that I am doing for the draft article on Acharya Dr Sthaneshwar Timalsina. I would like to declare that I am not a paid editor for Dr Timalsina . Nor am I related to him. I however know him personally as a student of this academic work . Please let me know if that disqualifies me from making edits to his page. If there is any other place I am required to make this declaration, I would be happy to do so. Regards

Ravi Rprakashmathur (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should declare your COI openly if you have been a direct student of him. Rest, I would encourage you to expand the article using a neutral language as per comments there to help it accepted. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 12:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you guide me where to declare the COI? I am new to Wikipedia Rprakashmathur (talk) 12:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can see: Template:User COI. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. On the talk page of the article. Thanks. Request for one more guidance. For establishing notability, is it required to be explicitly called out ? for example number of citations etc? Rprakashmathur (talk) 12:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, there is no fix number. Here are a my advices:

1. Use only WP:RS and not WP:PSTS.

2. Do not list everything, every journal publication. Wikipedia is not a CV read about it here.

2.1 Only mention the notable publication which have been mentioned so, or have been most widely read.

3. Only write what is backed by WP:RS, and put WP:CITATION and not hyperlinking.

4. You should consult MOS:BIO.

Thanks, User4edits (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your inputs Rprakashmathur (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please fulfil WP:NACADEMIC with WP:GNG, and also clean up the article as per MOS:BIO, right now, it reads like a newspaper. Only use WP:RS not self published like Academia.edu. Also, please answer about COI on your talk page. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User4edits (talk) 11:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise how the Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Criteria is established as fulfilled?

How to highlight to the reviewers that the criteria has been met? Do I create a separate section for it? Rprakashmathur (talk) 13:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rprakashmathur! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! User4edits (talk) 11:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Acharya Dr. Sthaneshwar Timalsina. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 14:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tantra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 11:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

noted Rprakashmathur (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have added the references to published papers and book on the subject. Please check. Rprakashmathur (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]